FFEM ranks 2nd and MEMS 8th of 9 funds in the Emerging Markets Active Growth Category.
FFEM vs MEMS
FFEM −0.29pt a year
0.60%0.89%
FFEM 13.3×the volume
14.2K1.07K
FFEM vs MEMS Performance
+15.5%+1.6%
- FFEM 0.60%, better
- MEMS 0.89%
- FFEM $67M
- MEMS $20M
- FFEM +15.5%, better
- MEMS +1.6%
- FFEM 1.71%
- MEMS 2.65%, better
- FFEM 120
- MEMS 82
- FFEM 14.2K sh, better
- MEMS 1.07K sh
- FFEM $38.12
- MEMS $28.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FFEM | MEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | F17 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C54Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A76Higher | D28 |
| Holdings | B63 | A78Higher |
| Durability | B68Higher | C47 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Active Growth funds
Same Category. FFEM and MEMS are both graded against the same 9 Emerging Markets Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FFEMA
MEMSD
In short
MEMS Most emerging-markets funds are a bet on a handful of giants. MEMS shops the other end of the shelf: an active portfolio with at least 65% in small emerging-market companies, at 0.89% net of a waiver through April 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
MEMS The fund invests primarily in stocks of small companies located in emerging-market countries, with at least 65% of net assets in small companies and at least 80% in emerging-market companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FFEM vs MEMS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FFEM vs MEMS Cost
Overpaying MEMS vs FFEM
$5,055
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FFEM 0.60%
$11,817
MEMS 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FFEM | MEMS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $1,576 | $500 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $5,953 | $1,837 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $16,872 | $5,055 |
- 0.60%FFEM, cheaper
- 0.89%MEMS
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Active Growth funds
- Median 0.79%
FFEM cheapest of 9 funds
MEMS 8th cheapest of 9 funds
FFEM vs MEMS Dividends
- FFEM 1.71%
- MEMS 2.65%, better
- FFEM $0.64
- MEMS $0.72
- FFEM $0.19
- MEMS $0.72
- FFEM Sep 18, 2026
- MEMS Dec 17, 2025
- FFEM Sep 22, 2026
- MEMS Dec 22, 2025
- FFEM Quarterly
- MEMS Irregular
Distribution history
FFEM vs MEMS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FFEM 19.5%MEMS 17.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FFEM 1.10MEMS 0.07
- Worst fall
- FFEM −16.6%MEMS −22.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FFEM 1.02MEMS 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.64%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.64%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.