QAI ranks 2nd and FFLS 22nd of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
FFLS vs QAI
QAI −1.24pt a year
2.05%0.81%
QAI 9.4×the volume
5.96K56.1K
FFLS +2.4pt
+11.3%+8.9%
FFLS vs QAI Performance
−2.3%+6.4%
- FFLS 2.05%
- QAI 0.81%, better
- FFLS $45M
- QAI $999M
- FFLS −2.3%
- QAI +6.4%, better
- FFLS 6.60%, better
- QAI 1.42%
- FFLS 29
- QAI 55
- FFLS 5.96K sh
- QAI 56.1K sh, better
- FFLS $23.11
- QAI $35.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FFLS | QAI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F17 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C47 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | C52 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | D28 | C50Higher |
| Durability | C53 | A84Higher |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. FFLS and QAI are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FFLSD
QAIA
In short
FFLS A hedge-fund playbook in an ETF shell: a concentrated book of roughly 60 long and short US equity positions, actively run with no index to hug. The flexibility is real, and so is the 2.05% price tag.
QAI The original hedge fund replication ETF, listed in 2009: a fund of roughly 50 exchange-traded products tracking an index built to mimic hedge fund styles, for 0.81% net of a fee waiver (1.03% gross).
Stated mandate
FFLS The Fund seeks capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio of long and short equity positions. It generally emphasizes U.S. exchange-listed securities and ADRs, while permitting foreign securities, derivatives, and ETFs.
QAI The Fund seeks to track the performance of the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index before fees and expenses. It uses passive indexing and invests primarily in exchange-traded products and related financial instruments representing the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FFLS vs QAI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FFLS vs QAI Cost
Overpaying FFLS vs QAI
$17,998
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FFLS 2.05%
$33,516
QAI 0.81%
$15,518
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FFLS | QAI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $3,460 | $1,439 | $2,021 |
| 20 | $12,415 | $5,456 | $6,959 |
| 30 | $33,516 | $15,518 | $17,998 |
- 2.05%FFLS
- 0.81%QAI, cheaper
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
QAI 5th cheapest of 29 funds
FFLS 24th cheapest of 29 funds
FFLS vs QAI Dividends
- FFLS 6.60%, better
- QAI 1.42%
- FFLS $1.53
- QAI $0.50
- FFLS $1.53
- QAI $0.50
- FFLS Dec 26, 2025
- QAI Dec 30, 2025
- FFLS Dec 30, 2025
- QAI Jan 5, 2026
- FFLS Annual
- QAI Annual
Distribution history
FFLS vs QAI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FFLS 8.9%QAI 5.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FFLS 0.75QAI 0.81, better
- Worst fall
- FFLS −11.1%QAI −14.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FFLS 0.55QAI 0.35
FFLS and QAI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 2.05% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.05% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.05% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

