QALT ranks 4th and FFLS 22nd of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
FFLS vs QALT
QALT −1.25pt a year
2.05%0.80%
QALT 3.0×the volume
5.96K17.7K
FFLS vs QALT Performance
−2.3%+6.6%
- FFLS 2.05%
- QALT 0.80%, better
- FFLS $45M
- QALT $195M
- FFLS −2.3%
- QALT +6.6%, better
- FFLS 6.60%
- QALT
- FFLS 29
- QALT 26
- FFLS 5.96K sh
- QALT 17.7K sh, better
- FFLS $23.11
- QALT $25.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FFLS | QALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F17 | A90Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C47 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | C52 | B57Higher |
| Holdings | D28 | |
| Durability | C53 | B65Higher |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. FFLS and QALT are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FFLSD
QALTA
In short
FFLS A hedge-fund playbook in an ETF shell: a concentrated book of roughly 60 long and short US equity positions, actively run with no index to hug. The flexibility is real, and so is the 2.05% price tag.
QALT One ticker, several hedge fund playbooks: SEI stacks sub-advisers running directional, event-driven and arbitrage strategies, and measures itself against 3-month T-bills instead of the S&P 500. It undercuts the typical alternatives fund on fees.
Stated mandate
FFLS The Fund seeks capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio of long and short equity positions. It generally emphasizes U.S. exchange-listed securities and ADRs, while permitting foreign securities, derivatives, and ETFs.
QALT The fund seeks positive absolute returns across market cycles with reduced correlation to stocks and bonds. It pursues this through multiple underlying funds and sub-advisers using directional or tactical, event-driven, and arbitrage approaches.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FFLS vs QALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FFLS vs QALT Cost
Overpaying FFLS vs QALT
$18,170
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FFLS 2.05%
$33,516
QALT 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FFLS | QALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $3,460 | $1,422 | $2,038 |
| 20 | $12,415 | $5,393 | $7,022 |
| 30 | $33,516 | $15,346 | $18,170 |
- 2.05%FFLS
- 0.80%QALT, cheaper
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
QALT 4th cheapest of 29 funds
FFLS 24th cheapest of 29 funds
FFLS vs QALT Dividends
- FFLS 6.60%
- QALT
- FFLS $1.53
- QALT
- FFLS $1.53
- QALT $0.17
- FFLS Dec 26, 2025
- QALT Oct 5, 2026
- FFLS Dec 30, 2025
- QALT Oct 6, 2026
- FFLS Annual
- QALT Quarterly
Distribution history
FFLS vs QALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FFLS 8.9%QALT 7.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FFLS 0.75QALT 0.77
- Worst fall
- FFLS −11.1%QALT −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FFLS 0.55QALT 0.24
FFLS and QALT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 2.05% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.05% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.05% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
