Skip to content

FHDG vs SIXJ

FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETF

FHDGDCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

SIXJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

SIXJ −0.11pt a year

FHDG0.85%SIXJ0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

SIXJ 1.8×the volume

FHDG8.42KSIXJ15.1K

FHDG vs SIXJ Performance

Nov 5, 2025 – Nov 5, 2026

+10.0%FHDG+8.6%SIXJ

Nov 5, 2025 to Nov 5, 2026. FHDG +10.0%. SIXJ +8.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%12.5%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FHDG 0.85%
SIXJ 0.74%, better
Fund size
FHDG $71M
SIXJ $149M
1Y total return
FHDG +10.0%, better
SIXJ +8.6%
Holdings
FHDG 3
SIXJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
FHDG 8.42K sh
SIXJ 15.1K sh, better
NAV per share
FHDG $37.32
SIXJ $37.49
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FHDG: Cost 11, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings 58, Durability 46. SIXJ: Cost 68, Risk 72, Mission not scored, Tradability 71, Holdings 53, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for FHDG, SIXJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFHDGSIXJ
Cost30% weightF11B68Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA76HigherA72
Tradability15% weightC45A71Higher
Holdings10% weightB58HigherC53
Durability5% weightC46B57Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FHDG and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

SIXJ ranks 2nd and FHDG 64th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 3BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 65
  4. Rank 58CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 64DFHDGFT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETFScore 39
  6. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FHDGDFT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETF

SIXJBAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

In short

FHDG Most buffer funds lock in one cushion for a full year. FHDG resets every three months and lets the cushion itself flex between 5.0% and 7.5% of S&P 500 losses, with a fresh upside cap set each period.

SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.

Stated mandate

FHDG The Fund seeks to track the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to an upside cap, while dynamically buffering either 5.0% or 7.5% of losses over approximately three months.

SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.

Why people hold it

  • FHDG The buffer isn't fixed. Each roughly three-month period opens with either 5.0% or 7.5% of downside absorbed, sized to what the options market can fund at the time.ftportfolios.com
  • Quarterly resets mean four fresh starts a year, so one awkward entry point doesn't set the terms for the next twelve months.
  • The reference is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses. No bespoke index to decode, just the benchmark most investors already track.
  • Sits in the upper half of a crowded shallow-buffer peer group, helped by day-to-day tradability that holds up against bigger names.
  • SIXJ The 10% buffer and the cap reset every January 1 and July 1, so terms refresh twice a year instead of on the usual annual clock.
  • 0.74% expense ratio, on the lean side for a defined-outcome fund and below the typical fee among its shallow-buffer peers.
  • The reference asset is SPY itself, the original S&P 500 ETF, so the payoff is keyed to a plain vanilla benchmark rather than a bespoke index.
  • Rates among the stronger implementations in a crowded shallow-buffer field, alongside AllianzIM's other six-month siblings like SIXZ and SIXD.

Worth knowing

  • FHDG At 0.85% a year it runs above the typical fund in its buffer cohort, and above shallow-buffer alternatives like ZALT (0.69%) and BUFB (0.10%).
  • The cap is reset each period, losses past the 5.0% or 7.5% buffer pass through in full, and the reference is a price return, so dividends don't come along.ftportfolios.com
  • Launched in late 2024, so the history is short, and the buffer math only lands as designed for holders who own it from one period start to the next.
  • SIXJ Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full six-month period. Buy mid-period and you get whatever cushion and upside room remain at that moment.
  • It tracks SPY's share-price return, so dividends aren't passed through and the fund isn't structured to pay income.
  • Volume is light next to the largest buffer funds, so bid-ask spreads can run wider, especially in fast-moving markets.

Full FHDG profile⁠

Full SIXJ profile⁠

FHDG vs SIXJ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FHDG vs SIXJ Cost

Overpaying FHDG vs SIXJ

$1,892

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FHDG 0.85%

    $16,199

  • SIXJ 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FHDG 0.85%
  • SIXJ 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FHDG $16,199SIXJ $14,307

Year by year

YearFHDGSIXJOverpaying
10$1,508$1,319$189
20$5,706$5,015$691
30$16,199$14,307$1,892

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%FHDG
  • 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds

FHDG 60th cheapest of 77 funds

FHDG vs SIXJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Payout (12M)
FHDG None
SIXJ None

Distribution history

FHDGAll FHDG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SIXJAll SIXJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FHDG vs SIXJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FHDG 5.6%since Dec 2024SIXJ 5.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FHDG 1.02since Dec 2024SIXJ 1.67
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FHDG −14.0%since Nov 2024SIXJ −14.1%since Jan 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FHDG 0.44SIXJ 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • FHDGDvsZALTA

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FHDGDvsAUGPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FHDGDvsBUFMB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETF · AB Moderate Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsBUFMB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · AB Moderate Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.