Skip to content

FHDG vs ZALT

FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETF

FHDGDCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.16pt a year

FHDG0.85%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 16.1×the volume

FHDG8.42KZALT135K

FHDG vs ZALT Performance

Nov 5, 2025 – Nov 5, 2026

+10.0%FHDG+6.0%ZALT

Nov 5, 2025 to Nov 5, 2026. FHDG +10.0%. ZALT +6.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%7.5%12.5%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FHDG 0.85%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
FHDG $71M
ZALT $845M
1Y total return
FHDG +10.0%, better
ZALT +6.0%
Holdings
FHDG 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
FHDG 8.42K sh
ZALT 135K sh, better
NAV per share
FHDG $37.32
ZALT $34.72
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FHDG: Cost 11, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings 58, Durability 46. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 80, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 89, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for FHDG, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFHDGZALT
Cost30% weightF11A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightA76A80Higher
Tradability15% weightC45B65Higher
Holdings10% weightB58A89Higher
Durability5% weightC46B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FHDG and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and FHDG 64th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 58CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  4. Rank 64DFHDGFT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETFScore 39
  5. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FHDGDFT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

FHDG Most buffer funds lock in one cushion for a full year. FHDG resets every three months and lets the cushion itself flex between 5.0% and 7.5% of S&P 500 losses, with a fresh upside cap set each period.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

FHDG The Fund seeks to track the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to an upside cap, while dynamically buffering either 5.0% or 7.5% of losses over approximately three months.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • FHDG The buffer isn't fixed. Each roughly three-month period opens with either 5.0% or 7.5% of downside absorbed, sized to what the options market can fund at the time.ftportfolios.com
  • Quarterly resets mean four fresh starts a year, so one awkward entry point doesn't set the terms for the next twelve months.
  • The reference is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses. No bespoke index to decode, just the benchmark most investors already track.
  • Sits in the upper half of a crowded shallow-buffer peer group, helped by day-to-day tradability that holds up against bigger names.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • FHDG At 0.85% a year it runs above the typical fund in its buffer cohort, and above shallow-buffer alternatives like ZALT (0.69%) and BUFB (0.10%).
  • The cap is reset each period, losses past the 5.0% or 7.5% buffer pass through in full, and the reference is a price return, so dividends don't come along.ftportfolios.com
  • Launched in late 2024, so the history is short, and the buffer math only lands as designed for holders who own it from one period start to the next.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full FHDG profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

FHDG vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FHDG vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying FHDG vs ZALT

$2,770

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FHDG 0.85%

    $16,199

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FHDG 0.85%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FHDG $16,199ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearFHDGZALTOverpaying
10$1,508$1,232$276
20$5,706$4,697$1,009
30$16,199$13,429$2,770

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%FHDG
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

FHDG 60th cheapest of 77 funds

FHDG vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Payout (12M)
FHDG None
ZALT None

Distribution history

FHDGAll FHDG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FHDG vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FHDG 5.6%since Dec 2024ZALT 3.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FHDG 1.02since Dec 2024ZALT 1.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FHDG −14.0%since Nov 2024ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FHDG 0.44ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • FHDGDvsSIXJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FHDGDvsAUGPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FHDGDvsBUFMB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETF · AB Moderate Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsBUFMB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AB Moderate Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.