ZALT ranks 1st and FHDG 64th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
FHDG vs ZALT
ZALT −0.16pt a year
0.85%0.69%
ZALT 16.1×the volume
8.42K135K
FHDG vs ZALT Performance
+10.0%+6.0%
- FHDG 0.85%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- FHDG $71M
- ZALT $845M
- FHDG +10.0%, better
- ZALT +6.0%
- FHDG 3
- ZALT 503
- FHDG 8.42K sh
- ZALT 135K sh, better
- FHDG $37.32
- ZALT $34.72
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FHDG | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | A76 | A80Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | B58 | A89Higher |
| Durability | C46 | B61Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. FHDG and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FHDGD
ZALTA
In short
FHDG Most buffer funds lock in one cushion for a full year. FHDG resets every three months and lets the cushion itself flex between 5.0% and 7.5% of S&P 500 losses, with a fresh upside cap set each period.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
FHDG The Fund seeks to track the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to an upside cap, while dynamically buffering either 5.0% or 7.5% of losses over approximately three months.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FHDG vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FHDG vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying FHDG vs ZALT
$2,770
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FHDG 0.85%
$16,199
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FHDG | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,232 | $276 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $4,697 | $1,009 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $13,429 | $2,770 |
- 0.85%FHDG
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
FHDG 60th cheapest of 77 funds
FHDG vs ZALT Dividends
- FHDG None
- ZALT None
Distribution history
FHDG vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FHDG 5.6%ZALT 3.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- FHDG 1.02ZALT 1.50
- Worst fall
- FHDG −14.0%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FHDG 0.44ZALT 0.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.