QLVD ranks 1st and FICS 5th of 6 funds in the International Quality Index Category.
FICS vs QLVD
QLVD −0.58pt a year
0.70%0.12%
FICS 5.7×the volume
10.2K1.77K
QLVD +2.5pt
+5.1%+7.6%
FICS vs QLVD Performance
+28.1%+44.1%
- FICS 0.70%
- QLVD 0.12%, better
- FICS $205M
- QLVD $54M
- FICS +10.9%
- QLVD +16.4%, better
- FICS 1.87%
- QLVD 2.98%, better
- FICS 56
- QLVD 197
- FICS 10.2K sh, better
- QLVD 1.77K sh
- FICS $41.74
- QLVD $34.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FICS | QLVD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A88Higher |
| Mission | A85Higher | A72 |
| Risk | B56 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | C45Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | C42 | A71Higher |
| Durability | C41 | C44Higher |
Rank among International Quality Index funds
Same Category. FICS and QLVD are both graded against the same 6 International Quality Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FICSC
QLVDA
In short
FICS A balance-sheet screen shipped overseas. FICS holds roughly 60 developed-market names filtered for financial strength and lower volatility, and charges 0.70% for the sorting work.
QLVD A defensive route into developed markets outside the US: drop the weakest quality quintile first, then build the low-volatility portfolio with limits on sector and country drift. Fee is 0.12%, net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
FICS The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of The International Developed Capital StrengthTM Index. Normally, it invests at least 90% of net assets in the index’s common stocks and REITs.
QLVD The fund is designed to provide exposure to developed-market companies outside the United States that have lower absolute volatility and financial strength and stability, the characteristics the issuer associates with quality.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FICS vs QLVD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FICS vs QLVD Cost
Overpaying FICS vs QLVD
$11,086
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FICS 0.70%
$13,606
QLVD 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FICS | QLVD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $220 | $1,030 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $859 | $3,901 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $2,520 | $11,086 |
- 0.70%FICS
- 0.12%QLVD, cheaper
- Middle half of International Quality Index funds
- Median 0.29%
QLVD cheapest of 6 funds
FICS 6th cheapest of 6 funds
FICS vs QLVD Dividends
- FICS 1.87%
- QLVD 2.98%, better
- FICS $0.78
- QLVD $1.03
- FICS $0.10
- QLVD $0.19
- FICS Sep 24, 2026
- QLVD Sep 18, 2026
- FICS Sep 30, 2026
- QLVD Sep 24, 2026
- FICS Quarterly
- QLVD Quarterly
Distribution history
FICS vs QLVD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FICS
- QLVD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FICS 12.3%QLVD 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FICS 0.80QLVD 1.08, better
- Worst fall
- FICS −29.2%QLVD −23.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FICS 0.71QLVD 0.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.27%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.27%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.