IDHQ ranks 2nd and FICS 5th of 6 funds in the International Quality Index Category.
FICS vs IDHQ
IDHQ −0.41pt a year
0.70%0.29%
IDHQ 18.3×the volume
10.2K186K
IDHQ +4.6pt
+5.1%+9.7%
FICS vs IDHQ Performance
+28.1%+58.7%
- FICS 0.70%
- IDHQ 0.29%, better
- FICS $205M
- IDHQ $1.22B
- FICS +10.9%
- IDHQ +30.6%, better
- FICS 1.87%
- IDHQ 1.93%, better
- FICS 56
- IDHQ 191
- FICS 10.2K sh
- IDHQ 186K sh, better
- FICS $41.74
- IDHQ $43.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FICS | IDHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | B64Higher |
| Mission | A85 | A88Higher |
| Risk | B56Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | C45 | C53Higher |
| Holdings | C42Higher | D39 |
| Durability | C41 | A75Higher |
Rank among International Quality Index funds
Same Category. FICS and IDHQ are both graded against the same 6 International Quality Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FICSC
IDHQB
In short
FICS A balance-sheet screen shipped overseas. FICS holds roughly 60 developed-market names filtered for financial strength and lower volatility, and charges 0.70% for the sorting work.
IDHQ One of the longest-running international quality funds: since 2007 it has held the developed ex-US names scoring highest on return on equity, accruals and leverage, for a fee below the typical international-factor rate.
Stated mandate
FICS The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of The International Developed Capital StrengthTM Index. Normally, it invests at least 90% of net assets in the index’s common stocks and REITs.
IDHQ The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the S&P Quality Developed ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index. It uses an index-based strategy focused on international developed-market equities selected for quality.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FICS vs IDHQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FICS vs IDHQ Cost
Overpaying FICS vs IDHQ
$7,654
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FICS 0.70%
$13,606
IDHQ 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FICS | IDHQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $527 | $723 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $2,044 | $2,716 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $5,952 | $7,654 |
- 0.70%FICS
- 0.29%IDHQ, cheaper
- Middle half of International Quality Index funds
- Median 0.29%
IDHQ 3rd cheapest of 6 funds
FICS 6th cheapest of 6 funds
FICS vs IDHQ Dividends
- FICS 1.87%
- IDHQ 1.93%, better
- FICS $0.78
- IDHQ $0.85
- FICS $0.10
- IDHQ $0.12
- FICS Sep 24, 2026
- IDHQ Sep 21, 2026
- FICS Sep 30, 2026
- IDHQ Sep 25, 2026
- FICS Quarterly
- IDHQ Quarterly
Distribution history
FICS vs IDHQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FICS
- IDHQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FICS 12.3%, betterIDHQ 14.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- FICS 0.80IDHQ 1.18, better
- Worst fall
- FICS −29.2%, betterIDHQ −32.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FICS 0.71IDHQ 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.27%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.27%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.