FITZ ranks 1st and MOTG 2nd of 5 funds in the Global Active Quality / Moat Category.
FITZ vs MOTG
5.7%by weight
MOTG −0.23pt a year
0.75%0.52%
FITZ 40.7×the volume
38.3K939
FITZ vs MOTG Performance
+7.7%+0.7%
- FITZ 0.75%
- MOTG 0.52%, better
- FITZ $108M
- MOTG $18M
- FITZ
- MOTG +5.3%
- FITZ
- MOTG 17.03%
- FITZ 31
- MOTG 79
- FITZ 38.3K sh, better
- MOTG 939 sh
- FITZ $26.40
- MOTG $40.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FITZ | MOTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C52 | A81Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A73Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | A84Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | B61 | A79Higher |
| Durability | C52 | B67Higher |
Rank among Global Active Quality / Moat funds
Same Category. FITZ and MOTG are both graded against the same 5 Global Active Quality / Moat funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FITZB
MOTGB
In short
FITZ Most quality funds hand you a rules-based moat screen. FITZ hands you one analyst's playbook: four decades of thematic research, actively managed around the structural forces reshaping the global economy.
MOTG The global side of VanEck's moat franchise: roughly 80 companies Morningstar rates as having wide competitive advantages, then screened again for the biggest discounts to Morningstar's own fair value estimates.
Stated mandate
FITZ The Fund seeks total returns through an actively managed portfolio invested primarily in equity securities selected using the proprietary Must Have Portfolio framework. The strategy uses thematic research focused on long-term structural changes and companies with durable profit potential.
MOTG The fund provides exposure to companies with Morningstar Economic Moat ratings of wide, emphasizing those trading at the lowest current market price-to-fair-value ratios.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FITZ vs MOTG Holdings
How FITZ and MOTG differ
5.7%
Shared holdings make up 11.4% of FITZ and 5.7% of MOTG.
Level by level
- Holdings5.7%
- Country36.7%
Sector
No Sector split for FITZ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in FITZMore in MOTG | FITZ | MOTG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FITZ +63.3 points | 100.0% | 36.7% |
| Japan | MOTG +12.5 points | 0.0% | 12.5% |
| China | MOTG +11.3 points | 0.0% | 11.3% |
| United Kingdom | MOTG +10.2 points | 0.0% | 10.2% |
| France | MOTG +8.7 points | 0.0% | 8.7% |
| Netherlands | MOTG +6.4 points | 0.0% | 6.4% |
| Germany | MOTG +4.1 points | 0.0% | 4.1% |
| Australia | MOTG +3.3 points | 0.0% | 3.3% |
| Other countries (4) | MOTG +6.8 points | 0.0% | 6.8% |
Outside the US: MOTG 76% developed, 24% emerging.
Concentration
- FITZ46.6%
- MOTG21.6%
- FITZ30
- MOTG75
Asset class
- FITZ
- Equity
- MOTG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in FITZ27
- In both3
- Only in MOTG72
Only in FITZ
27 securities, 88.6% of FITZ by weight
- Palantir Technologies Inc5.55%
- Crowdstrike Holdings Inc4.93%
- Eli Lilly & Co4.83%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20314.68%
- Apple Inc4.63%
- Chevron Corp4.63%
- Walmart Inc4.46%
- JPMorgan Chase & Co.4.34%
- AbbVie Inc4.29%
- Lockheed Martin Corp4.23%
- Gilead Sciences Inc4.20%
- Tesla Inc4.20%
- RTX Corp3.95%
- Advanced Micro Devices Inc3.90%
- Waste Management Inc3.10%
- ExxonMobil Holdings Corp2.98%
- CareTrust REIT Inc2.88%
- GE Vernova Inc2.60%
- Kinder Morgan Inc2.37%
- IonQ Inc2.01%
- Costco Wholesale Corp2.00%
- Amazon.com Inc1.73%
- Space Exploration Technologies Corp1.69%
- Alphabet Inc1.37%
- Procter & Gamble Co/The1.27%
- Micron Technology Inc1.23%
- Rocket Lab Corp0.50%
Only in MOTG
72 securities, 94.4% of MOTG by weight
- Danaher Corp2.30%
- Estee Lauder Cos Inc/The2.26%
- Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc2.18%
- Sony Group Corp2.14%
- Elekta Ab2.14%
- Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc2.12%
- Bureau Veritas Sa2.09%
- Spirax-Sarco Engineering Plc2.09%
- Yum China Holdings Inc2.06%
- Bae Systems Plc2.05%
- Hensoldt Ag2.03%
- Koninklijke Philips Nv2.03%
- Foshan Haitian Flavouring & Food Co Ltd2.01%
- Dassault Aviation Sa2.00%
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co L1.98%
- Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc1.98%
- Gsk Plc1.91%
- Thales Sa1.90%
- Ferrovial Se1.78%
- Charles Schwab Corp/The1.74%
- Ambev Sa1.69%
- Alibaba Group Holding Ltd1.64%
- Allegion Plc1.39%
- Kao Corp1.21%
- Advantest Corp1.20%
- Brambles Ltd1.19%
- Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Co1.17%
- Roche Holding Ag1.16%
- Agilent Technologies Inc1.14%
- Asx Ltd1.13%
- Ge Healthcare Technologies Inc1.13%
- Sartorius Stedim Biotech1.13%
- Nxp Semiconductors Nv1.12%
- Entegris Inc1.09%
- Masco Corp1.09%
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co1.07%
- Walt Disney Co/The1.07%
- London Stock Exchange Group Plc1.06%
- Brown-Forman Corp1.06%
- Amphenol Corp1.05%
- Kweichow Moutai Co Ltd1.04%
- Edenred1.04%
- Heineken Nv1.04%
- Hoshizaki Corp1.03%
- Us Bancorp1.02%
- Unicharm Corp1.01%
- Endeavour Group Ltd/Australia1.01%
- Mondelez International Inc1.00%
- Hoya Corp1.00%
- Meta Platforms Inc1.00%
Weight gaps
All 3 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in FITZMore in MOTG | FITZ | MOTG |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | FITZ +2.48 points | 4.29% | 1.81% |
| Microsoft Corp | FITZ +1.92 points | 4.15% | 2.23% |
| Broadcom Inc | FITZ +1.28 points | 2.96% | 1.68% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FITZ vs MOTG Cost
Overpaying FITZ vs MOTG
$4,131
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FITZ 0.75%
$14,482
MOTG 0.52%
$10,351
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FITZ | MOTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $935 | $401 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $3,593 | $1,485 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $10,351 | $4,131 |
- 0.75%FITZ
- 0.52%MOTG, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Active Quality / Moat funds
- Median 0.75%
MOTG cheapest of 5 funds
FITZ 2nd cheapest of 5 funds
FITZ vs MOTG Dividends
- FITZ
- MOTG 17.03%
- FITZ
- MOTG $6.88
- FITZ $0.06
- MOTG $6.88
- FITZ Sep 18, 2026
- MOTG Dec 22, 2025
- FITZ Sep 21, 2026
- MOTG Dec 26, 2025
- FITZ Irregular
- MOTG Annual
Distribution history
FITZ vs MOTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FITZ MOTG 12.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- FITZ MOTG 1.04
- Worst fall
- FITZ MOTG −24.3%
- Market sensitivity
- FITZ 2.29MOTG 0.84
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.