Skip to content

FITZ vs MOTG

Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF

FITZBNYSE Arca

VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF

MOTGBCboe

Overlap

5.7%by weight

Expense ratio

MOTG −0.23pt a year

FITZ0.75%MOTG0.52%

Avg volume · 30D

FITZ 40.7×the volume

FITZ38.3KMOTG939

FITZ vs MOTG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

+7.7%FITZ+0.7%MOTG

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. FITZ +7.7%. MOTG +0.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%2.5%5%10%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FITZ 0.75%
MOTG 0.52%, better
Fund size
FITZ $108M
MOTG $18M
1Y total return
FITZ No data
MOTG +5.3%
Yield (12M)
FITZ No data
MOTG 17.03%
Holdings
FITZ 31
MOTG 79
Avg volume (30D)
FITZ 38.3K sh, better
MOTG 939 sh
NAV per share
FITZ $26.40
MOTG $40.08
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FITZ: Cost 52, Risk 73, Mission not scored, Tradability 84, Holdings 61, Durability 52. MOTG: Cost 81, Risk 44, Mission not scored, Tradability 29, Holdings 79, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for FITZ, MOTG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFITZMOTG
Cost30% weightC52A81Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA73HigherC44
Tradability15% weightA84HigherD29
Holdings10% weightB61A79Higher
Durability5% weightC52B67Higher

Rank among Global Active Quality / Moat funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FITZ and MOTG are both graded against the same 5 Global Active Quality / Moat funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 5 ›

FITZ ranks 1st and MOTG 2nd of 5 funds in the Global Active Quality / Moat Category.

  1. Rank 1BFITZFitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BMOTGVanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 3CSQSSapient Quality Select ETFScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FITZBFitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF

MOTGBVanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF

In short

FITZ Most quality funds hand you a rules-based moat screen. FITZ hands you one analyst's playbook: four decades of thematic research, actively managed around the structural forces reshaping the global economy.

MOTG The global side of VanEck's moat franchise: roughly 80 companies Morningstar rates as having wide competitive advantages, then screened again for the biggest discounts to Morningstar's own fair value estimates.

Stated mandate

FITZ The Fund seeks total returns through an actively managed portfolio invested primarily in equity securities selected using the proprietary Must Have Portfolio framework. The strategy uses thematic research focused on long-term structural changes and companies with durable profit potential.

MOTG The fund provides exposure to companies with Morningstar Economic Moat ratings of wide, emphasizing those trading at the lowest current market price-to-fair-value ratios.

Why people hold it

  • FITZ Built on Keith Fitz-Gerald's proprietary Must Have Portfolio framework, drawn from 40-plus years of research, run as an actively managed equity fund seeking total returns.sec.gov
  • Themes cut across sectors (digitalization, defense, supply-chain dislocation) instead of sorting by industry bucket, so the book can look nothing like a standard moat index.x.combusinesswire.com
  • At 0.75% it sits right at the median for active global-quality funds, under Fundsmith's ETFT (1.00%) and Sapient's SQS (0.80%).
  • Among the smoother-trading names in its small peer group, listed on a US exchange with a standard creation and redemption process.nasdaqtrader.com
  • MOTG Two screens, not one: a wide moat rating first, then the widest discount to Morningstar's fair value estimate. Quality gets pricey; this one insists on paying less for it.vaneck.com
  • At 0.52% a year, it undercuts the median fee in its global active-equity peer group (0.69%).
  • Roughly 80 stocks drawn worldwide, so the moats aren't all American. Portfolio construction is one of its stronger suits inside the peer group.
  • Live since 2018, so the record reflects real market history rather than a backtest.

Worth knowing

  • FITZ 0.75% is well above the cheapest moat option in the group, MOTG at 0.52%, and you are paying for one manager's judgment rather than an index.
  • Launched in 2026, so there is little live history behind the framework and risk measures rest on a thin record.
  • Deliberately concentrated and non-diversified, so single holdings can move the fund more than in a broad index.nasdaqtrader.comx.com
  • MOTG Small and thinly traded, which typically means wider bid/ask spreads than mainstream global funds.
  • Cheaper than the peer median, not cheap outright: broad global funds like GSWO (0.15%) and DFAW (0.24%) charge less than half.
  • Distributions come annually or semiannually, so it isn't built as a steady income stream.

Full FITZ profile⁠

Full MOTG profile⁠

FITZ vs MOTG Holdings

How FITZ and MOTG differ

Overlap by weight

5.7%

Shared holdings make up 11.4% of FITZ and 5.7% of MOTG.

Level by level

  • Holdings3 in both5.7%
  • Countryby domicile36.7%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for FITZ.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FITZ and MOTG, widest gap first
CountryMore in FITZMore in MOTG
United StatesFITZ +63.3 points
JapanMOTG +12.5 points
ChinaMOTG +11.3 points
United KingdomMOTG +10.2 points
FranceMOTG +8.7 points
NetherlandsMOTG +6.4 points
GermanyMOTG +4.1 points
AustraliaMOTG +3.3 points
Other countries (4)MOTG +6.8 points

Outside the US: MOTG 76% developed, 24% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FITZ46.6%
  • MOTG21.6%

Securities held

  • FITZ30
  • MOTG75

Asset class

FITZ
Equity
MOTG
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FITZ27
  • In both3
  • Only in MOTG72

Only in FITZ

27 securities, 88.6% of FITZ by weight

  • Palantir Technologies Inc5.55%
  • Crowdstrike Holdings Inc4.93%
  • Eli Lilly & Co4.83%

Only in MOTG

72 securities, 94.4% of MOTG by weight

  • Danaher Corp2.30%
  • Estee Lauder Cos Inc/The2.26%
  • Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc2.18%

Weight gaps

All 3 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FITZ and MOTG, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FITZMore in MOTG
NVIDIA CorpNVDAFITZ +2.48 points
Microsoft CorpMSFTFITZ +1.92 points
Broadcom IncAVGOFITZ +1.28 points

All FITZ holdings⁠All 80 MOTG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FITZ vs MOTG Cost

Overpaying FITZ vs MOTG

$4,131

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FITZ 0.75%

    $14,482

  • MOTG 0.52%

    $10,351

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FITZ 0.75%
  • MOTG 0.52%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530FITZ $14,482MOTG $10,351

Year by year

YearFITZMOTGOverpaying
10$1,336$935$401
20$5,078$3,593$1,485
30$14,482$10,351$4,131

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%FITZ
  • 0.52%MOTG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Global Active Quality / Moat funds
  • Median 0.75%

MOTG cheapest of 5 funds

FITZ 2nd cheapest of 5 funds

FITZ vs MOTG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
FITZ No data
MOTG 17.03%
Payout (12M)
FITZ No data
MOTG $6.88
Last payment
FITZ $0.06
MOTG $6.88
Ex-dividend
FITZ Sep 18, 2026
MOTG Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
FITZ Sep 21, 2026
MOTG Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
FITZ Irregular
MOTG Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

FITZIrregular · 1 paymentAll FITZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Sep 18, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5202020232026YTD
MOTGAnnual · 8 paymentsAll MOTG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2018 $0.11; Dec 23, 2019 $0.73; Dec 21, 2020 $1.03; Dec 20, 2021 $2.21; Dec 19, 2022 $1.17; Dec 18, 2023 $0.65; Dec 23, 2024 $2.03; Dec 22, 2025 $6.88. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5202020232026YTD

FITZ vs MOTG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FITZ No dataMOTG 12.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FITZ No dataMOTG 1.04
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FITZ No dataMOTG −24.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FITZ 2.29MOTG 0.84

Popular comparisons

  • FITZBvsSQSC

    Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF · Sapient Quality Select ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MOTGBvsSQSC

    VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF · Sapient Quality Select ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FITZBvsBCGDC

    Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF · Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MOTGBvsBCGDC

    VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF · Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FITZBvsETFTD

    Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF · Fundsmith Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 1.00%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MOTGBvsETFTD

    VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF · Fundsmith Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 1.00%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.