Skip to content
etf.net

BCGD vs FITZ

Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF

BCGDCNYSE

Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF

FITZBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

BCGD0.75%FITZ0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

FITZ 18.8×the volume

BCGD2.04KFITZ38.3K

BCGD vs FITZ Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−0.9%BCGD+7.7%FITZ

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. BCGD −0.9%. FITZ +7.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%2.5%5%10%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BCGD 0.75%
FITZ 0.75%
Fund size
BCGD $10M
FITZ $108M
Holdings
BCGD 41
FITZ 31
Avg volume (30D)
BCGD 2.04K sh
FITZ 38.3K sh, better
NAV per share
BCGD $25.97
FITZ $26.40
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BCGD: Cost 52, Risk 32, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings 57, Durability 39. FITZ: Cost 52, Risk 73, Mission not scored, Tradability 84, Holdings 61, Durability 52.
Pillar letters and Scores for BCGD, FITZ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBCGDFITZ
Cost30% weightC52C52
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD32A73Higher
Tradability15% weightD32A84Higher
Holdings10% weightB57B61Higher
Durability5% weightD39C52Higher

Rank among Global Active Quality / Moat funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BCGD and FITZ are both graded against the same 5 Global Active Quality / Moat funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Active Quality / Moat⁠

Category · 5 funds
See all 5 ›

FITZ ranks 1st and BCGD 4th of 5 funds in the Global Active Quality / Moat Category.

  1. Rank 1BFITZFitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BMOTGVanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 3CSQSSapient Quality Select ETFScore 44
  4. Rank 4CBCGDBaron Global Durable Advantage ETFScore 43
  5. Rank 5DETFTFundsmith Equity ETFScore 26

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BCGDCBaron Global Durable Advantage ETF

FITZBFitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF

In short

BCGD No data

FITZ Most quality funds hand you a rules-based moat screen. FITZ hands you one analyst's playbook: four decades of thematic research, actively managed around the structural forces reshaping the global economy.

Stated mandate

BCGD No data

FITZ The Fund seeks total returns through an actively managed portfolio invested primarily in equity securities selected using the proprietary Must Have Portfolio framework. The strategy uses thematic research focused on long-term structural changes and companies with durable profit potential.

Why people hold it

BCGD No data

  • FITZ Built on Keith Fitz-Gerald's proprietary Must Have Portfolio framework, drawn from 40-plus years of research, run as an actively managed equity fund seeking total returns.sec.gov
  • Themes cut across sectors (digitalization, defense, supply-chain dislocation) instead of sorting by industry bucket, so the book can look nothing like a standard moat index.x.combusinesswire.com
  • At 0.75% it sits right at the median for active global-quality funds, under Fundsmith's ETFT (1.00%) and Sapient's SQS (0.80%).
  • Among the smoother-trading names in its small peer group, listed on a US exchange with a standard creation and redemption process.nasdaqtrader.com

Worth knowing

BCGD No data

  • FITZ 0.75% is well above the cheapest moat option in the group, MOTG at 0.52%, and you are paying for one manager's judgment rather than an index.
  • Launched in 2026, so there is little live history behind the framework and risk measures rest on a thin record.
  • Deliberately concentrated and non-diversified, so single holdings can move the fund more than in a broad index.nasdaqtrader.comx.com

Full BCGD profile⁠

Full FITZ profile⁠

BCGD vs FITZ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BCGD vs FITZ Cost

Same expense ratio

$14,482

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BCGD 0.75%

    $14,482

  • FITZ 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BCGD 0.75%
  • FITZ 0.75%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530BCGD $14,482FITZ $14,482

Year by year

YearBCGDFITZ
10$1,336$1,336
20$5,078$5,078
30$14,482$14,482

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%BCGD
  • 0.75%FITZ
  • Middle half of Global Active Quality / Moat funds
  • Median 0.75%

BCGD 2nd cheapest of 5 funds

FITZ 2nd cheapest of 5 funds

BCGD vs FITZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
BCGD None
FITZ No data
Last payment
BCGD No data
FITZ $0.06
Ex-dividend
BCGD No data
FITZ Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
BCGD No data
FITZ Sep 21, 2026
Frequency
BCGD No data
FITZ Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

BCGDAll BCGD payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FITZIrregular · 1 paymentAll FITZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2026 YTD. Sep 18, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.052026YTD

BCGD vs FITZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BCGD 1.08FITZ 2.29

Popular comparisons

  • BCGDCvsMOTGB

    Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF · VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.52%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FITZBvsMOTGB

    Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF · VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.52%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BCGDCvsSQSC

    Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF · Sapient Quality Select ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FITZBvsSQSC

    Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF · Sapient Quality Select ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BCGDCvsETFTD

    Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF · Fundsmith Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 1.00%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FITZBvsETFTD

    Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF · Fundsmith Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 1.00%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.