FITZ ranks 1st and ETFT 5th of 5 funds in the Global Active Quality / Moat Category.
ETFT vs FITZ
4.4%by weight
FITZ −0.25pt a year
1.00%0.75%
FITZ 17.9×the volume
2.14K38.3K
ETFT vs FITZ Performance
+5.9%+7.7%
- ETFT 1.00%
- FITZ 0.75%, better
- ETFT $8M
- FITZ $108M
- ETFT 30
- FITZ 31
- ETFT 2.14K sh
- FITZ 38.3K sh, better
- ETFT $10.27
- FITZ $26.40
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ETFT | FITZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F12 | C52Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D35 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | D32 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | B61Higher |
| Durability | D26 | C52Higher |
Rank among Global Active Quality / Moat funds
Same Category. ETFT and FITZ are both graded against the same 5 Global Active Quality / Moat funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ETFTD
FITZB
In short
ETFT A global quality-growth stockpicker in an ETF wrapper, live since late 2025: profitable, growing companies of any size, anywhere, with at least 80% of assets in equities.
FITZ Most quality funds hand you a rules-based moat screen. FITZ hands you one analyst's playbook: four decades of thematic research, actively managed around the structural forces reshaping the global economy.
Stated mandate
ETFT The Fund seeks long-term growth by investing globally in listed equities, with at least 80% of net assets normally in equity securities and a primary focus on common stocks of U.S. and non-U.S. companies of any size.
FITZ The Fund seeks total returns through an actively managed portfolio invested primarily in equity securities selected using the proprietary Must Have Portfolio framework. The strategy uses thematic research focused on long-term structural changes and companies with durable profit potential.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ETFT vs FITZ Holdings
How ETFT and FITZ differ
4.4%
Shared holdings make up 8.0% of FITZ and 7.1% of ETFT.
Level by level
- Holdings4.4%
- Country76.8%
Sector
No Sector split for ETFT and FITZ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in ETFTMore in FITZ | ETFT | FITZ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FITZ +23.2 points | 76.8% | 100.0% |
| France | ETFT +9.8 points | 9.8% | 0.0% |
| Spain | ETFT +5.3 points | 5.3% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | ETFT +4.7 points | 4.7% | 0.0% |
| Taiwan | ETFT +3.4 points | 3.4% | 0.0% |
Outside the US: ETFT 85% developed, 15% emerging.
Concentration
- ETFT48.8%
- FITZ46.6%
- ETFT29
- FITZ30
Asset class
- ETFT
- Equity
- FITZ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in ETFT26
- In both3
- Only in FITZ27
Only in ETFT
26 securities, 88.2% of ETFT by weight
- Mastercard Inc.5.41%
- Amadeus IT Group SA5.26%
- Visa Inc.5.20%
- Church & Dwight Co. Inc.4.96%
- Veeva Systems Inc.4.83%
- Stryker Corp.4.79%
- Waters Corp.4.63%
- Sage Group PLC4.53%
- Philip Morris International Inc.4.50%
- L'Oreal SA4.30%
- Yum! Brands Inc.4.28%
- Uber Technologies Inc.3.73%
- Marriott International Inc.3.57%
- Automatic Data Processing Inc.3.44%
- TJX Cos. Inc.3.34%
- Bureau Veritas SA2.99%
- Texas Instruments Inc.2.96%
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd.2.96%
- Fortinet Inc.2.24%
- Legrand SA2.16%
- IDEXX Laboratories Inc.2.00%
- Alphabet Inc.1.91%
- Nextpower Inc.1.90%
- Meta Platforms Inc.1.46%
- AppLovin Corp.0.56%
- Netflix Inc.0.29%
Only in FITZ
27 securities, 92.0% of FITZ by weight
- Palantir Technologies Inc5.55%
- Crowdstrike Holdings Inc4.93%
- Eli Lilly & Co4.83%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20314.68%
- Apple Inc4.63%
- Chevron Corp4.63%
- Walmart Inc4.46%
- JPMorgan Chase & Co.4.34%
- NVIDIA Corp4.29%
- AbbVie Inc4.29%
- Lockheed Martin Corp4.23%
- Gilead Sciences Inc4.20%
- Tesla Inc4.20%
- RTX Corp3.95%
- Advanced Micro Devices Inc3.90%
- Waste Management Inc3.10%
- ExxonMobil Holdings Corp2.98%
- Broadcom Inc2.96%
- CareTrust REIT Inc2.88%
- Kinder Morgan Inc2.37%
- IonQ Inc2.01%
- Costco Wholesale Corp2.00%
- Amazon.com Inc1.73%
- Space Exploration Technologies Corp1.69%
- Alphabet Inc1.37%
- Micron Technology Inc1.23%
- Rocket Lab Corp0.50%
Weight gaps
All 3 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in ETFTMore in FITZ | ETFT | FITZ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Procter & Gamble Co. | ETFT +2.72 points | 3.99% | 1.27% |
| GE Vernova Inc. | FITZ +1.90 points | 0.70% | 2.60% |
| Microsoft Corp. | FITZ +1.73 points | 2.42% | 4.15% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ETFT vs FITZ Cost
Overpaying ETFT vs FITZ
$4,206
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ETFT 1.00%
$18,688
FITZ 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ETFT | FITZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,336 | $427 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $5,078 | $1,547 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $14,482 | $4,206 |
- 1.00%ETFT
- 0.75%FITZ, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Active Quality / Moat funds
- Median 0.75%
FITZ 2nd cheapest of 5 funds
ETFT 5th cheapest of 5 funds
ETFT vs FITZ Dividends
- ETFT None
- FITZ
- ETFT
- FITZ $0.06
- ETFT
- FITZ Sep 18, 2026
- ETFT
- FITZ Sep 21, 2026
- ETFT
- FITZ Irregular
Distribution history
ETFT vs FITZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- ETFT 1.00FITZ 2.29
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.52%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.52%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.