Skip to content

ETFT vs FITZ

Fundsmith Equity ETF

ETFTDNYSE Arca

Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF

FITZBNYSE Arca

Overlap

4.4%by weight

Expense ratio

FITZ −0.25pt a year

ETFT1.00%FITZ0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

FITZ 17.9×the volume

ETFT2.14KFITZ38.3K

ETFT vs FITZ Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

+5.9%ETFT+7.7%FITZ

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. ETFT +5.9%. FITZ +7.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%10%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ETFT 1.00%
FITZ 0.75%, better
Fund size
ETFT $8M
FITZ $108M
Holdings
ETFT 30
FITZ 31
Avg volume (30D)
ETFT 2.14K sh
FITZ 38.3K sh, better
NAV per share
ETFT $10.27
FITZ $26.40
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ETFT: Cost 12, Risk 35, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings 46, Durability 26. FITZ: Cost 52, Risk 73, Mission not scored, Tradability 84, Holdings 61, Durability 52.
Pillar letters and Scores for ETFT, FITZ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarETFTFITZ
Cost30% weightF12C52Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD35A73Higher
Tradability15% weightD32A84Higher
Holdings10% weightC46B61Higher
Durability5% weightD26C52Higher

Rank among Global Active Quality / Moat funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ETFT and FITZ are both graded against the same 5 Global Active Quality / Moat funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 5 ›

FITZ ranks 1st and ETFT 5th of 5 funds in the Global Active Quality / Moat Category.

  1. Rank 1BFITZFitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BMOTGVanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 4CBCGDBaron Global Durable Advantage ETFScore 43
  4. Rank 5DETFTFundsmith Equity ETFScore 26

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ETFTDFundsmith Equity ETF

FITZBFitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF

In short

ETFT A global quality-growth stockpicker in an ETF wrapper, live since late 2025: profitable, growing companies of any size, anywhere, with at least 80% of assets in equities.

FITZ Most quality funds hand you a rules-based moat screen. FITZ hands you one analyst's playbook: four decades of thematic research, actively managed around the structural forces reshaping the global economy.

Stated mandate

ETFT The Fund seeks long-term growth by investing globally in listed equities, with at least 80% of net assets normally in equity securities and a primary focus on common stocks of U.S. and non-U.S. companies of any size.

FITZ The Fund seeks total returns through an actively managed portfolio invested primarily in equity securities selected using the proprietary Must Have Portfolio framework. The strategy uses thematic research focused on long-term structural changes and companies with durable profit potential.

Why people hold it

  • ETFT Tight, legible mandate: US and non-US common stocks of any size, chosen on growth, profitability and quality rather than index weights.
  • Genuinely global and size-agnostic. No country sleeves, no market-cap box, just one portfolio of businesses.
  • Aimed at long-term growth rather than income, so the work is done by the companies it owns instead of a payout schedule.
  • FITZ Built on Keith Fitz-Gerald's proprietary Must Have Portfolio framework, drawn from 40-plus years of research, run as an actively managed equity fund seeking total returns.sec.gov
  • Themes cut across sectors (digitalization, defense, supply-chain dislocation) instead of sorting by industry bucket, so the book can look nothing like a standard moat index.x.combusinesswire.com
  • At 0.75% it sits right at the median for active global-quality funds, under Fundsmith's ETFT (1.00%) and Sapient's SQS (0.80%).
  • Among the smoother-trading names in its small peer group, listed on a US exchange with a standard creation and redemption process.nasdaqtrader.com

Worth knowing

  • ETFT The fee is 1.00% a year, at the pricier end of this peer group. Cheaper active global growth exists, such as CGGO at 0.47%.
  • Launched in late 2025, so there is very little live record to judge, and our review currently places it in the lower half of its cohort.
  • Still a small, thinly traded fund, which typically means wider bid-ask spreads than the heavily traded names in the category.
  • FITZ 0.75% is well above the cheapest moat option in the group, MOTG at 0.52%, and you are paying for one manager's judgment rather than an index.
  • Launched in 2026, so there is little live history behind the framework and risk measures rest on a thin record.
  • Deliberately concentrated and non-diversified, so single holdings can move the fund more than in a broad index.nasdaqtrader.comx.com

Full ETFT profile⁠

Full FITZ profile⁠

ETFT vs FITZ Holdings

How ETFT and FITZ differ

Overlap by weight

4.4%

Shared holdings make up 8.0% of FITZ and 7.1% of ETFT.

Level by level

  • Holdings3 in both4.4%
  • Countryby domicile76.8%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for ETFT and FITZ.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ETFT and FITZ, widest gap first
CountryMore in ETFTMore in FITZ
United StatesFITZ +23.2 points
FranceETFT +9.8 points
SpainETFT +5.3 points
United KingdomETFT +4.7 points
TaiwanETFT +3.4 points

Outside the US: ETFT 85% developed, 15% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ETFT48.8%
  • FITZ46.6%

Securities held

  • ETFT29
  • FITZ30

Asset class

ETFT
Equity
FITZ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in ETFT26
  • In both3
  • Only in FITZ27

Only in ETFT

26 securities, 88.2% of ETFT by weight

  • Mastercard Inc.5.41%
  • Amadeus IT Group SA5.26%
  • Visa Inc.5.20%

Only in FITZ

27 securities, 92.0% of FITZ by weight

  • Palantir Technologies Inc5.55%
  • Crowdstrike Holdings Inc4.93%
  • Eli Lilly & Co4.83%

Weight gaps

All 3 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in ETFT and FITZ, widest gap first
HoldingMore in ETFTMore in FITZ
Procter & Gamble Co.PGETFT +2.72 points
GE Vernova Inc.GEVFITZ +1.90 points
Microsoft Corp.MSFTFITZ +1.73 points

All 29 ETFT holdings⁠All FITZ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ETFT vs FITZ Cost

Overpaying ETFT vs FITZ

$4,206

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ETFT 1.00%

    $18,688

  • FITZ 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ETFT 1.00%
  • FITZ 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530ETFT $18,688FITZ $14,482

Year by year

YearETFTFITZOverpaying
10$1,763$1,336$427
20$6,625$5,078$1,547
30$18,688$14,482$4,206

Expense ratio

  • 1.00%ETFT
  • 0.75%FITZ, cheaper
  • Middle half of Global Active Quality / Moat funds
  • Median 0.75%

FITZ 2nd cheapest of 5 funds

ETFT 5th cheapest of 5 funds

ETFT vs FITZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
ETFT None
FITZ No data
Last payment
ETFT No data
FITZ $0.06
Ex-dividend
ETFT No data
FITZ Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
ETFT No data
FITZ Sep 21, 2026
Frequency
ETFT No data
FITZ Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

ETFTAll ETFT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FITZIrregular · 1 paymentAll FITZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2026 YTD. Sep 18, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.052026YTD

ETFT vs FITZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ETFT 1.00FITZ 2.29

Popular comparisons

  • ETFTDvsMOTGB

    Fundsmith Equity ETF · VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.52%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FITZBvsMOTGB

    Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF · VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.52%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ETFTDvsSQSC

    Fundsmith Equity ETF · Sapient Quality Select ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FITZBvsSQSC

    Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF · Sapient Quality Select ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ETFTDvsBCGDC

    Fundsmith Equity ETF · Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FITZBvsBCGDC

    Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF · Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.