FIW ranks 1st and TBLU 2nd of 6 funds in the Water Category.
FIW vs TBLU
TBLU −0.10pt a year
0.50%0.40%
FIW 27.3×the volume
49K1.8K
FIW +1.9pt
+5.1%+3.2%
FIW vs TBLU Performance
+28.4%+17.1%
- FIW 0.50%
- TBLU 0.40%, better
- FIW $1.83B
- TBLU $55M
- FIW +1.6%, better
- TBLU −0.5%
- FIW 0.71%
- TBLU 3.50%, better
- FIW 37
- TBLU 61
- FIW 49K sh, better
- TBLU 1.8K sh
- FIW $112.27
- TBLU $50.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FIW | TBLU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A88Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C50 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | A79Higher | F21 |
| Holdings | A79Higher | D36 |
| Durability | A76Higher | C42 |
Rank among Water funds
Same Category. FIW and TBLU are both graded against the same 6 Water funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FIWB
TBLUB
In short
FIW Water is the least glamorous essential business on earth, and FIW has been buying it since 2007: roughly 40 companies earning real revenue from drinking water and wastewater, at a fee below most of the water field.
TBLU Tortoise didn't license a water benchmark, it built one. TBLU tracks its own global water index, ESG screened, for 0.40% a year.
Stated mandate
FIW The fund seeks returns that generally track the pre-expense price and yield of the ISE Clean Edge WaterTM Index, which covers listed companies deriving substantial revenue from potable and wastewater activities.
TBLU The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total-return performance of the Tortoise Global Water Net Total Return Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FIW vs TBLU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FIW vs TBLU Cost
Overpaying FIW vs TBLU
$1,889
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FIW 0.50%
$9,979
TBLU 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FIW | TBLU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $723 | $177 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $2,793 | $667 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $8,090 | $1,889 |
- 0.50%FIW
- 0.40%TBLU, cheaper
- Middle half of Water funds
- Median 0.54%
TBLU cheapest of 6 funds
FIW 2nd cheapest of 6 funds
FIW vs TBLU Dividends
- FIW 0.71%
- TBLU 3.50%, better
- FIW $0.79
- TBLU $1.78
- FIW $0.19
- TBLU $0.50
- FIW Sep 24, 2026
- TBLU Jun 25, 2026
- FIW Sep 30, 2026
- TBLU Jun 26, 2026
- FIW Quarterly
- TBLU Twice a year
Distribution history
FIW vs TBLU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FIW
- TBLU
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FIW 16.1%TBLU 15.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FIW 0.59TBLU 0.62, better
- Worst fall
- FIW −28.5%, betterTBLU −35.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FIW 0.99TBLU 0.92
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.