TBLU ranks 2nd and PHO 3rd of 6 funds in the Water Category.
PHO vs TBLU
TBLU −0.19pt a year
0.59%0.40%
PHO 41.6×the volume
74.7K1.8K
PHO +2.3pt
+5.5%+3.2%
PHO vs TBLU Performance
+30.7%+17.1%
- PHO 0.59%
- TBLU 0.40%, better
- PHO $2.05B
- TBLU $55M
- PHO +3.8%, better
- TBLU −0.5%
- PHO 0.50%
- TBLU 3.50%, better
- PHO 42
- TBLU 61
- PHO 74.7K sh, better
- TBLU 1.8K sh
- PHO $73.79
- TBLU $50.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PHO | TBLU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A88Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C50 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | A85Higher | F21 |
| Holdings | C54Higher | D36 |
| Durability | A77Higher | C42 |
Rank among Water funds
Same Category. PHO and TBLU are both graded against the same 6 Water funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PHOC
TBLUB
In short
PHO The original water ETF, listed in 2005 and still on the same beat: about 40 US-listed companies that purify, pump and conserve water. Rivals roam the globe. This one stays home.
TBLU Tortoise didn't license a water benchmark, it built one. TBLU tracks its own global water index, ESG screened, for 0.40% a year.
Stated mandate
PHO The fund seeks to track the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, investing primarily in US-listed companies whose products are designed to conserve and purify water for homes, businesses, and industries.
TBLU The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total-return performance of the Tortoise Global Water Net Total Return Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PHO vs TBLU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PHO vs TBLU Cost
Overpaying PHO vs TBLU
$3,545
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PHO 0.59%
$11,635
TBLU 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PHO | TBLU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $723 | $335 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $2,793 | $1,258 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $8,090 | $3,545 |
- 0.59%PHO
- 0.40%TBLU, cheaper
- Middle half of Water funds
- Median 0.54%
TBLU cheapest of 6 funds
PHO 5th cheapest of 6 funds
PHO vs TBLU Dividends
- PHO 0.50%
- TBLU 3.50%, better
- PHO $0.37
- TBLU $1.78
- PHO $0.06
- TBLU $0.50
- PHO Sep 21, 2026
- TBLU Jun 25, 2026
- PHO Sep 25, 2026
- TBLU Jun 26, 2026
- PHO Quarterly
- TBLU Twice a year
Distribution history
PHO vs TBLU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PHO
- TBLU
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PHO 15.8%TBLU 15.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PHO 0.62TBLU 0.62Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- PHO −28.6%, betterTBLU −35.4%
- Market sensitivity
- PHO 0.95TBLU 0.92
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.