SCHZ ranks 2nd and FLCB 17th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
FLCB vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.12pt a year
0.15%0.03%
SCHZ 4.6×the volume
512K2.37M
SCHZ +0.1pt
−0.3%−0.2%
FLCB vs SCHZ Performance
−1.3%−1.0%
- FLCB 0.15%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- FLCB $3.19B
- SCHZ $10.8B
- FLCB −0.2%
- SCHZ −0.2%
- FLCB 4.47%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- FLCB 676
- SCHZ 12610
- FLCB 512K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- FLCB $20.81
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLCB | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C54Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A73 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | B55 | A78Higher |
| Durability | A77 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. FLCB and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLCBA
SCHZA
In short
FLCB An actively managed core bond fund that plays off the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate instead of copying it, for 0.15%. Managers set the sector, credit and duration mix; income arrives monthly.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
FLCB The actively managed ETF invests at least 80% of net assets in bonds of U.S. issuers, including government, corporate, mortgage-backed, and asset-backed debt. It is predominantly investment grade and generally manages sector, credit, and duration exposure with reference to the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLCB vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLCB vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying FLCB vs SCHZ
$2,499
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLCB 0.15%
$3,137
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLCB | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $55 | $219 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $216 | $855 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $638 | $2,499 |
- 0.15%FLCB
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
FLCB 24th cheapest of 114 funds
FLCB vs SCHZ Dividends
- FLCB 4.47%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- FLCB $0.93
- SCHZ $0.96
- FLCB $0.08
- SCHZ $0.08
- FLCB Oct 1, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- FLCB Oct 6, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- FLCB Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
FLCB vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLCB
- SCHZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLCB 5.6%SCHZ 5.6%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- FLCB 0.18, betterSCHZ 0.17
- Worst fall
- FLCB −17.9%SCHZ −17.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FLCB 1.01SCHZ 0.99
FLCB and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

