Skip to content

FLCH vs KBA

Franklin FTSE China ETF

FLCHANYSE Arca

KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF

KBAANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FLCH −0.37pt a year

FLCH0.19%KBA0.56%

Avg volume · 30D

FLCH 3.7×the volume

FLCH108KKBA29.2K

5Y return · a year

KBA +5.8pt

FLCH−4.1%KBA+1.7%

FLCH vs KBA Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−18.7%FLCH+9.0%KBA

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FLCH −18.7%. KBA +9.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FLCH 0.19%, better
KBA 0.56%
Fund size
FLCH $252M
KBA $105M
1Y total return
FLCH −20.9%
KBA −5.5%, better
Yield (12M)
FLCH 2.63%, better
KBA 1.71%
Holdings
FLCH 1112
KBA 52
Avg volume (30D)
FLCH 108K sh, better
KBA 29.2K sh
NAV per share
FLCH $19.38
KBA $28.35
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FLCH: Cost 100, Risk 64, Mission 87, Tradability 62, Holdings 65, Durability 70. KBA: Cost 86, Risk 76, Mission 83, Tradability 51, Holdings 61, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for FLCH, KBA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFLCHKBA
Cost30% weightA100HigherA86
Mission25% weightA87HigherA83
Risk15% weightB64A76Higher
Tradability15% weightB62HigherC51
Holdings10% weightB65HigherB61
Durability5% weightA70HigherB60

Rank among China funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FLCH and KBA are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

China⁠

Category · 28 funds
See all 28 ›

FLCH ranks 2nd and KBA 5th of 28 funds in the China Category.

  1. Rank 1ACXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises FundScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFLCHFranklin FTSE China ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3AMCHIiShares MSCI China ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 4AGXCState Street SPDR S&P China ETFScore 76
  5. Rank 5AKBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETFScore 74
  6. Rank 6AASHRXtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETFScore 73

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FLCHAFranklin FTSE China ETF

KBAAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF

In short

FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.

KBA The first US-listed ETF built on an MSCI China A-share index, running since 2014. It owns mainland Shanghai and Shenzhen stocks through Stock Connect rather than Hong Kong listings or ADRs.

Stated mandate

FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.

KBA The fund tracks the MSCI China A 50 Connect Index, which represents 50 large-cap Chinese A-shares listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen and accessible through Stock Connect.

Why people hold it

  • FLCH 0.19% a year, against a roughly 0.70% median for China funds. It also undercuts the category stalwarts MCHI and GXC, both at 0.59%.
  • About 1,000 holdings, so you own the long tail of Chinese listings rather than a short list of mega-cap headline names.
  • One job, done tightly: mirror the FTSE China RIC Capped Index before fees. On tracking it ranks among the strongest builds in its China peer group.sec.gov
  • KBA Most US-listed China funds hold Hong Kong shares and ADRs. This one buys the onshore market itself: 50 large A-shares in Shanghai and Shenzhen, accessed via Stock Connect.kraneshares.com
  • The index takes the 50 largest A-shares but keeps at least two stocks per sector and matches the parent MSCI China A Index's sector weights, curbing the usual financials pile-up.msci.commsci.com 2
  • 0.56% net of a contractual waiver through August 1, 2028 (0.79% gross), below the median fee among the 30 China funds we grade.kraneshares.com
  • Live since March 2014 via a KraneShares and Bosera partnership, and it tracks its index closely. One of the stronger implementations in the China peer group.kraneshares.com

Worth knowing

  • FLCH It is China or nothing. Policy shifts, regulatory news and the currency drive the ride, with no other market in the basket to cushion it.
  • Mid-sized and only moderately traded next to the category's giants, so bid-ask spreads can bite more on larger orders.
  • Cash comes once or twice a year, not monthly. This is an equity index vehicle, not an income schedule.
  • KBA Thinly traded next to the big offshore China funds, so spreads can widen. Limit orders matter, especially since US hours do not overlap mainland trading.
  • FLCH (0.19%) and CXSE (0.32%) charge less, but they hold offshore China shares, a different market with different companies.
  • Fifty mega caps only: no small or mid caps, and distributions come once or twice a year rather than quarterly.

Full FLCH profile⁠

Full KBA profile⁠

FLCH vs KBA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FLCH vs KBA Cost

Overpaying KBA vs FLCH

$7,136

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FLCH 0.19%

    $3,952

  • KBA 0.56%

    $11,088

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FLCH 0.19%
  • KBA 0.56%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530KBA $11,088FLCH $3,952

Year by year

YearFLCHKBAOverpaying
10$347$1,006$659
20$1,351$3,855$2,504
30$3,952$11,088$7,136

Expense ratio

  • 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
  • 0.56%KBA
  • Middle half of China funds
  • Median 0.65%

FLCH cheapest of 28 funds

KBA 4th cheapest of 28 funds

FLCH vs KBA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FLCH 2.63%, better
KBA 1.71%
Payout (12M)
FLCH $0.51
KBA $0.48
Last payment
FLCH $0.14
KBA $0.48
Ex-dividend
FLCH Jun 26, 2026
KBA Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
FLCH Jul 6, 2026
KBA Dec 23, 2025
Frequency
FLCH Twice a year
KBA Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FLCHTwice a year · 18 paymentsAll FLCH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2017 $0.00084; Jun 20, 2018 $0.10; Dec 20, 2018 $0.29; Jun 11, 2019 $0.03; Dec 11, 2019 $0.46; Jun 11, 2020 $0.04; Dec 14, 2020 $0.25; Jun 10, 2021 $0.03; Dec 13, 2021 $0.34; Jun 17, 2022 $0.14; Dec 16, 2022 $0.36; Jun 16, 2023 $0.19; Dec 15, 2023 $0.37; Jun 21, 2024 $0.12; Dec 20, 2024 $0.41; Jun 20, 2025 $0.19; Dec 19, 2025 $0.37; Jun 26, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD
KBAAnnual · 10 paymentsAll KBA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 19, 2017 $0.34; Dec 26, 2018 $0.92; Dec 27, 2019 $0.50; Dec 29, 2020 $0.30; Dec 29, 2021 $3.94; Dec 14, 2022 $6.25; Dec 28, 2022 $6.25; Dec 18, 2023 $0.48; Dec 17, 2024 $0.51; Dec 22, 2025 $0.48. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD

FLCH vs KBA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FLCH
  • KBA
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FLCH −48.1% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FLCH 21.1%KBA 19.2%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FLCH 0.29KBA 0.43, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FLCH −48.1%KBA −39.7%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FLCH 0.55KBA 0.68

Popular comparisons

  • FLCHAvsCXSEA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KBAAvsCXSEA

    KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.56% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsMCHIA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KBAAvsMCHIA

    KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.56% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsGXCA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KBAAvsGXCA

    KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.56% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.