CXSE ranks 1st and FLCH 2nd of 28 funds in the China Category.
CXSE vs FLCH
FLCH −0.13pt a year
0.32%0.19%
FLCH 2.9×the volume
37.2K108K
FLCH +5.3pt
−9.4%−4.1%
CXSE vs FLCH Performance
−39.0%−18.7%
- CXSE 0.32%
- FLCH 0.19%, better
- CXSE $372M
- FLCH $252M
- CXSE −24.9%
- FLCH −20.9%, better
- CXSE 2.22%
- FLCH 2.63%, better
- CXSE 241
- FLCH 1112
- CXSE 37.2K sh
- FLCH 108K sh, better
- CXSE $31.37
- FLCH $19.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CXSE | FLCH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A87 |
| Risk | C47 | B64Higher |
| Tradability | B63Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | A74Higher | B65 |
| Durability | A79Higher | A70 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CXSE and FLCH are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CXSEA
FLCHA
In short
CXSE CXSE tracks an index that screens state-owned enterprises out of China, leaving the privately run companies. A tilt toward entrepreneurs rather than Beijing's balance sheet, at a fee well under the typical China fund.
FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.
Stated mandate
CXSE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index.
FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CXSE vs FLCH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CXSE vs FLCH Cost
Overpaying CXSE vs FLCH
$2,590
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CXSE 0.32%
$6,542
FLCH 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CXSE | FLCH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $580 | $347 | $233 |
| 20 | $2,250 | $1,351 | $899 |
| 30 | $6,542 | $3,952 | $2,590 |
- 0.32%CXSE
- 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
FLCH cheapest of 28 funds
CXSE 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
CXSE vs FLCH Dividends
- CXSE 2.22%
- FLCH 2.63%, better
- CXSE $0.69
- FLCH $0.51
- CXSE $0.26
- FLCH $0.14
- CXSE Sep 25, 2026
- FLCH Jun 26, 2026
- CXSE Sep 29, 2026
- FLCH Jul 6, 2026
- CXSE Quarterly
- FLCH Twice a year
Distribution history
CXSE vs FLCH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CXSE
- FLCH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CXSE 24.9%FLCH 21.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CXSE 0.12FLCH 0.29, better
- Worst fall
- CXSE −57.6%FLCH −48.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CXSE 0.75FLCH 0.55
Popular comparisons
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.56%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.56%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.