FLCH ranks 2nd and GXC 4th of 28 funds in the China Category.
FLCH vs GXC
FLCH −0.40pt a year
0.19%0.59%
FLCH 4.6×the volume
108K23.4K
GXC +0.2pt
−4.1%−3.9%
FLCH vs GXC Performance
−18.7%−18.2%
- FLCH 0.19%, better
- GXC 0.59%
- FLCH $252M
- GXC $421M
- FLCH −20.9%
- GXC −19.1%, better
- FLCH 2.63%, better
- GXC 2.46%
- FLCH 1112
- GXC 1539
- FLCH 108K sh, better
- GXC 23.4K sh
- FLCH $19.38
- GXC $80.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLCH | GXC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A87Higher | A85 |
| Risk | B64 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | A76Higher |
| Durability | A70 | A84Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. FLCH and GXC are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLCHA
GXCA
In short
FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.
GXC The whole China market in one ticker: roughly 1,400 stocks from megacaps down to small caps, tracked since 2007. Most China funds buy the famous names. GXC buys the phone book.
Stated mandate
FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.
GXC The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P China BMI Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLCH vs GXC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLCH vs GXC Cost
Overpaying GXC vs FLCH
$7,683
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLCH 0.19%
$3,952
GXC 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLCH | GXC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $1,058 | $711 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $4,051 | $2,700 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $11,635 | $7,683 |
- 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
- 0.59%GXC
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
FLCH cheapest of 28 funds
GXC 5th cheapest of 28 funds
FLCH vs GXC Dividends
- FLCH 2.63%, better
- GXC 2.46%
- FLCH $0.51
- GXC $1.99
- FLCH $0.14
- GXC $0.67
- FLCH Jun 26, 2026
- GXC Jun 22, 2026
- FLCH Jul 6, 2026
- GXC Jun 26, 2026
- FLCH Twice a year
- GXC Twice a year
Distribution history
FLCH vs GXC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLCH
- GXC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLCH 21.1%GXC 20.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FLCH 0.29, betterGXC 0.27
- Worst fall
- FLCH −48.1%GXC −46.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FLCH 0.55GXC 0.69
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.56%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.56%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.