Skip to content

FLCH vs PGJ

Franklin FTSE China ETF

FLCHANYSE Arca

Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF

PGJCNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

FLCH −0.51pt a year

FLCH0.19%PGJ0.70%

Avg volume · 30D

FLCH 5.0×the volume

FLCH108KPGJ21.8K

5Y return · a year

FLCH +7.7pt

FLCH−4.1%PGJ−11.8%

FLCH vs PGJ Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−18.7%FLCH−46.7%PGJ

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FLCH −18.7%. PGJ −46.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−10%0%10%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FLCH 0.19%, better
PGJ 0.70%
Fund size
FLCH $252M
PGJ $76M
1Y total return
FLCH −20.9%, better
PGJ −33.5%
Yield (12M)
FLCH 2.63%, better
PGJ 2.07%
Holdings
FLCH 1112
PGJ 68
Avg volume (30D)
FLCH 108K sh, better
PGJ 21.8K sh
NAV per share
FLCH $19.38
PGJ $20.82
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FLCH: Cost 100, Risk 64, Mission 87, Tradability 62, Holdings 65, Durability 70. PGJ: Cost 38, Risk 25, Mission 62, Tradability 70, Holdings 40, Durability 73.
Pillar letters and Scores for FLCH, PGJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFLCHPGJ
Cost30% weightA100HigherD38
Mission25% weightA87HigherB62
Risk15% weightB64HigherD25
Tradability15% weightB62A70Higher
Holdings10% weightB65HigherC40
Durability5% weightA70A73Higher

Rank among China funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FLCH and PGJ are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

China⁠

Category · 28 funds
See all 28 ›

FLCH ranks 2nd and PGJ 15th of 28 funds in the China Category.

  1. Rank 1ACXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises FundScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFLCHFranklin FTSE China ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3AMCHIiShares MSCI China ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 15CMCHMatthews China Active ETFScore 48
  5. Rank 15CPGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETFScore 48
  6. Rank 17CMAGCRoundhill China Magnificent Seven ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FLCHAFranklin FTSE China ETF

PGJCInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF

In short

FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.

PGJ Most China funds route you through Hong Kong or mainland listings. PGJ takes the other door: it holds Chinese companies that list their shares in the US, tracking a Nasdaq index built around that single screen. It has done it that way since 2004.

Stated mandate

FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.

PGJ The fund is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index and provides China-focused equity exposure.

Why people hold it

  • FLCH 0.19% a year, against a roughly 0.70% median for China funds. It also undercuts the category stalwarts MCHI and GXC, both at 0.59%.
  • About 1,000 holdings, so you own the long tail of Chinese listings rather than a short list of mega-cap headline names.
  • One job, done tightly: mirror the FTSE China RIC Capped Index before fees. On tracking it ranks among the strongest builds in its China peer group.sec.gov
  • PGJ Holds Chinese businesses whose stock trades on US exchanges, largely ADRs. US-market plumbing, US settlement, no Hong Kong or mainland access required.nasdaqomx.comnasdaqomx.com 2
  • Launched in 2004, one of the longer-running China ETFs available, and tied to the same Nasdaq Golden Dragon China Index the entire time.invesco.com
  • The US-listing rule narrows the field to roughly 70 names, a different slice of China than broad-market trackers like MCHI or GXC pull in. Pays quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • FLCH It is China or nothing. Policy shifts, regulatory news and the currency drive the ride, with no other market in the basket to cushion it.
  • Mid-sized and only moderately traded next to the category's giants, so bid-ask spreads can bite more on larger orders.
  • Cash comes once or twice a year, not monthly. This is an equity index vehicle, not an income schedule.
  • PGJ 0.70% a year sits at the China-fund median but several times what broad index rivals like FLCH (0.19%) and JCHI (0.15%) charge.
  • That US-listing screen cuts both ways. The prospectus flags US government action, including delisting Chinese companies from US exchanges, as a risk to these holdings.saytechnologies.com
  • Trades thinly next to the giants of the China category, so spreads and order size carry more weight.

Full FLCH profile⁠

Full PGJ profile⁠

FLCH vs PGJ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FLCH vs PGJ Cost

Overpaying PGJ vs FLCH

$9,654

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FLCH 0.19%

    $3,952

  • PGJ 0.70%

    $13,606

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FLCH 0.19%
  • PGJ 0.70%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530PGJ $13,606FLCH $3,952

Year by year

YearFLCHPGJOverpaying
10$347$1,250$903
20$1,351$4,760$3,409
30$3,952$13,606$9,654

Expense ratio

  • 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
  • 0.70%PGJ
  • Middle half of China funds
  • Median 0.65%

FLCH cheapest of 28 funds

PGJ 19th cheapest of 28 funds

FLCH vs PGJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FLCH 2.63%, better
PGJ 2.07%
Payout (12M)
FLCH $0.51
PGJ $0.43
Last payment
FLCH $0.14
PGJ $0.15
Ex-dividend
FLCH Jun 26, 2026
PGJ Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
FLCH Jul 6, 2026
PGJ Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
FLCH Twice a year
PGJ Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FLCHTwice a year · 18 paymentsAll FLCH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2017 $0.00084; Jun 20, 2018 $0.10; Dec 20, 2018 $0.29; Jun 11, 2019 $0.03; Dec 11, 2019 $0.46; Jun 11, 2020 $0.04; Dec 14, 2020 $0.25; Jun 10, 2021 $0.03; Dec 13, 2021 $0.34; Jun 17, 2022 $0.14; Dec 16, 2022 $0.36; Jun 16, 2023 $0.19; Dec 15, 2023 $0.37; Jun 21, 2024 $0.12; Dec 20, 2024 $0.41; Jun 20, 2025 $0.19; Dec 19, 2025 $0.37; Jun 26, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
PGJQuarterly · 27 paymentsAll PGJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 27 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2017 $0.20; Sep 18, 2017 $0.11; Dec 18, 2017 $0.61; Jun 18, 2018 $0.03; Sep 24, 2018 $0.07; Jun 24, 2019 $0.05; Sep 23, 2019 $0.02; Mar 23, 2020 $0.09; Jun 22, 2020 $0.03; Dec 21, 2020 $0.08; Jun 21, 2022 $0.08; Sep 19, 2022 $0.07; Dec 19, 2022 $0.08; Mar 20, 2023 $0.02; Jun 20, 2023 $0.09; Sep 18, 2023 $0.14; Dec 18, 2023 $0.40; Jun 24, 2024 $1.01; Sep 23, 2024 $0.15; Dec 23, 2024 $0.07; Mar 24, 2025 $0.07; Jun 23, 2025 $0.21; Sep 22, 2025 $0.48; Dec 22, 2025 $0.20; Mar 23, 2026 $0.01; Jun 22, 2026 $0.07; Sep 21, 2026 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

FLCH vs PGJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FLCH
  • PGJ
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PGJ −61.2% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FLCH 21.1%, betterPGJ 28.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FLCH 0.29, betterPGJ −0.13
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FLCH −48.1%, betterPGJ −61.2%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FLCH 0.55PGJ 0.85

Popular comparisons

  • FLCHAvsCXSEA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PGJCvsCXSEA

    Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsMCHIA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PGJCvsMCHIA

    Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsGXCA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PGJCvsGXCA

    Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.