FLCH ranks 2nd and PGJ 15th of 28 funds in the China Category.
FLCH vs PGJ
FLCH −0.51pt a year
0.19%0.70%
FLCH 5.0×the volume
108K21.8K
FLCH +7.7pt
−4.1%−11.8%
FLCH vs PGJ Performance
−18.7%−46.7%
- FLCH 0.19%, better
- PGJ 0.70%
- FLCH $252M
- PGJ $76M
- FLCH −20.9%, better
- PGJ −33.5%
- FLCH 2.63%, better
- PGJ 2.07%
- FLCH 1112
- PGJ 68
- FLCH 108K sh, better
- PGJ 21.8K sh
- FLCH $19.38
- PGJ $20.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLCH | PGJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | D38 |
| Mission | A87Higher | B62 |
| Risk | B64Higher | D25 |
| Tradability | B62 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | B65Higher | C40 |
| Durability | A70 | A73Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. FLCH and PGJ are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLCHA
PGJC
In short
FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.
PGJ Most China funds route you through Hong Kong or mainland listings. PGJ takes the other door: it holds Chinese companies that list their shares in the US, tracking a Nasdaq index built around that single screen. It has done it that way since 2004.
Stated mandate
FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.
PGJ The fund is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index and provides China-focused equity exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLCH vs PGJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLCH vs PGJ Cost
Overpaying PGJ vs FLCH
$9,654
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLCH 0.19%
$3,952
PGJ 0.70%
$13,606
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLCH | PGJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $1,250 | $903 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $4,760 | $3,409 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $13,606 | $9,654 |
- 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
- 0.70%PGJ
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
FLCH cheapest of 28 funds
PGJ 19th cheapest of 28 funds
FLCH vs PGJ Dividends
- FLCH 2.63%, better
- PGJ 2.07%
- FLCH $0.51
- PGJ $0.43
- FLCH $0.14
- PGJ $0.15
- FLCH Jun 26, 2026
- PGJ Sep 21, 2026
- FLCH Jul 6, 2026
- PGJ Sep 25, 2026
- FLCH Twice a year
- PGJ Quarterly
Distribution history
FLCH vs PGJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLCH
- PGJ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLCH 21.1%, betterPGJ 28.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLCH 0.29, betterPGJ −0.13
- Worst fall
- FLCH −48.1%, betterPGJ −61.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FLCH 0.55PGJ 0.85
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.