Skip to content

FLDZ vs WAR

TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF

FLDZBCboe

U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF

WARCNYSE Arca

Overlap

9.9%by weight

Expense ratio

FLDZ −0.20pt a year

FLDZ0.40%WAR0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

WAR 110.8×the volume

FLDZ125WAR13.9K

FLDZ vs WAR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−6.8%FLDZ+16.9%WAR

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. FLDZ −6.8%. WAR +16.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.40%60%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FLDZ 0.40%, better
WAR 0.60%
Fund size
FLDZ $7M
WAR $32M
1Y total return
FLDZ −6.8%
WAR +16.9%, better
Yield (12M)
FLDZ 1.67%
WAR No data
Holdings
FLDZ 66
WAR 29
Avg volume (30D)
FLDZ 125 sh
WAR 13.9K sh, better
NAV per share
FLDZ $26.38
WAR $27.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FLDZ: Cost 76, Risk 42, Mission 42, Tradability 36, Holdings 92, Durability 62. WAR: Cost 34, Risk 40, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings 55, Durability 52.
Pillar letters and Scores for FLDZ, WAR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFLDZWAR
Cost30% weightA76HigherD34
Mission25% weightC42Not scored
Risk15% weightC42HigherC40
Tradability15% weightD36D39Higher
Holdings10% weightA92HigherB55
Durability5% weightB62HigherC52

Rank among Defense & Aerospace funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FLDZ and WAR are both graded against the same 25 Defense & Aerospace funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Defense & Aerospace⁠

Category · 25 funds
See all 25 ›

FLDZ ranks 3rd and WAR 14th of 25 funds in the Defense & Aerospace Category.

  1. Rank 1AXARState Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 2AITAiShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETFScore 74
  3. Rank 3BFLDZTrueShares Patriot Defense ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 4BFOWFPacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 14CGCADGabelli Commercial Aerospace and Defense ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 14CWARU.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 14CWRCorgi U.S. War Machine ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FLDZBTrueShares Patriot Defense ETF

WARCU.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF

In short

FLDZ A defense-stock ETF with an unusual arrangement: the adviser's management fee, less fund expenses, goes to the Folds of Honor Foundation. Launched in 2021 as a patriot-themed core equity fund, it now runs an active, concentrated book of aerospace and defense names.

WAR Most defense funds buy the primes. WAR's bet is that modern warfare runs on chips, code and data centers, so it pairs aerospace and defense names with semiconductors and cybersecurity in one active, roughly 30-stock portfolio.

Stated mandate

FLDZ The Fund seeks capital growth.

WAR The Fund seeks capital appreciation. It invests at least 80% of net assets in technology and aerospace and defense equities, emphasizing companies whose products, services, or innovations support national defense, including aerospace, physical, and cybersecurity defense.

Why people hold it

  • FLDZ The adviser's management fee, less fund operating expenses, goes to Folds of Honor, a charity funding scholarships for families of fallen or disabled service members and first responders.true-shares.comtrue-shares.com 2
  • Charges 0.40% a year, below the median for its actively managed US stock peers. The charitable angle does not arrive with a premium price tag attached.
  • The mandate is spelled out: at least 80% of net assets in aerospace and defense companies as classified by GICS, with a policy of concentrating in that industry. No guessing what you own.sec.gov
  • WAR Defense plus the tech behind it: aerospace and defense manufacturers sit alongside semiconductors, cybersecurity, data centers and electronic warfare names.globenewswire.com
  • Actively managed, not a fixed defense index: managers pick names with quantitative screens and fundamental research, benchmarked to the S&P 500 Total Return Index.usfunds.comusglobaletfs.com
  • Roughly 30 holdings, so each position carries real weight. A concentrated take on the theme rather than a watered-down basket.

Worth knowing

  • FLDZ The strategy was rewritten in 2026 from broad US-economy equities to defense companies, so the fund's older track record reflects a different portfolio.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • Non-diversified and concentrated in one industry, so a single contract award or budget headline moves it more than it would a broad market fund.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so bid-ask spreads tend to run wider than on heavily traded ETFs. Limit orders matter more here.
  • WAR 0.60% a year runs a touch above the typical global thematic fund. That is the tab for an active manager rather than an index.
  • Non-diversified and deliberately concentrated, so a rough stretch for chipmakers can drag it even when defense spending holds up.globenewswire.com
  • Launched at the end of 2024 and still a small, lightly traded fund: short track record, and spreads can be wider than in the category giants.

Full FLDZ profile⁠

Full WAR profile⁠

FLDZ vs WAR Holdings

How FLDZ and WAR differ

Overlap by weight

9.9%

Shared holdings make up 28.2% of WAR and 9.9% of FLDZ.

Level by level

  • Holdings6 in both9.9%
  • Sector4 Sectors49.6%
  • Countryby domicile84.9%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in FLDZ and WAR, widest gap first
SectorMore in FLDZMore in WAR
TechnologyWAR +50.4 points
IndustrialsFLDZ +49.1 points
MaterialsFLDZ +1.2 points
CommunicationFLDZ +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FLDZ and WAR, widest gap first
CountryMore in FLDZMore in WAR
AustraliaWAR +7.0 points
United StatesFLDZ +5.6 points
United KingdomFLDZ +4.8 points
GermanyWAR +3.5 points
FranceFLDZ +3.0 points
SwedenWAR +2.7 points
NetherlandsWAR +2.0 points
ItalyFLDZ +1.7 points

Outside the US: WAR 100% developed, 0% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FLDZ18.7%
  • WAR57.7%

Securities held

  • FLDZ66
  • WAR29

Asset class

FLDZ
Equity
WAR
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FLDZ60
  • In both6
  • Only in WAR23

Only in FLDZ

60 securities, 90.1% of FLDZ by weight

  • Lockheed Martin Corp1.99%
  • Huntington Ingalls Industries1.93%
  • L3Harris Technologies Inc1.91%

Only in WAR

23 securities, 71.9% of WAR by weight

  • Micron Technology Inc7.43%
  • DroneShield Ltd6.70%
  • Rheinmetall AG6.64%

Weight gaps

All 6 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FLDZ and WAR, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FLDZMore in WAR
AeroVironment IncAVAVWAR +6.08 points
Axon Enterprise IncAXONWAR +3.89 points
National Presto Industries IncNPKWAR +2.65 points
Loar Holdings IncLOARWAR +2.15 points
Karman Holdings IncKRMNWAR +1.77 points
Palantir Technologies IncPLTRWAR +1.73 points

All 66 FLDZ holdings⁠All 29 WAR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FLDZ vs WAR Cost

Overpaying WAR vs FLDZ

$3,727

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FLDZ 0.40%

    $8,090

  • WAR 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FLDZ 0.40%
  • WAR 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530WAR $11,817FLDZ $8,090

Year by year

YearFLDZWAROverpaying
10$723$1,076$353
20$2,793$4,116$1,323
30$8,090$11,817$3,727

Expense ratio

  • 0.40%FLDZ, cheaper
  • 0.60%WAR
  • Middle half of Defense & Aerospace funds
  • Median 0.50%

FLDZ 6th cheapest of 25 funds

WAR 16th cheapest of 25 funds

FLDZ vs WAR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
FLDZ 1.67%
WAR No data
Payout (12M)
FLDZ $0.45
WAR No data
Last payment
FLDZ $0.45
WAR $2.95
Ex-dividend
FLDZ Dec 24, 2025
WAR Dec 24, 2025
Paid on
FLDZ Dec 26, 2025
WAR Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
FLDZ Annual
WAR Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

FLDZAnnual · 4 paymentsAll FLDZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2022 $0.33; Dec 27, 2023 $0.33; Dec 27, 2024 $0.32; Dec 24, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD
WARIrregular · 1 paymentAll WAR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2025 $2.95. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD

FLDZ vs WAR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FLDZ 14.5%WAR 32.0%since Jan 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FLDZ 0.35WAR 0.81since Jan 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FLDZ −25.1%since Jan 2022WAR −25.2%since Dec 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FLDZ 0.77WAR 1.85

Popular comparisons

  • FLDZBvsXARA

    TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WARCvsXARA

    U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLDZBvsITAA

    TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF · iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WARCvsITAA

    U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF · iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLDZBvsFOWFB

    TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF · Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WARCvsFOWFB

    U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF · Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.