SCYB ranks 1st and FLHY 16th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
FLHY vs SCYB
SCYB −0.37pt a year
0.40%0.03%
SCYB 4.1×the volume
269K1.1M
FLHY +0.6pt
+9.0%+8.4%
FLHY vs SCYB Performance
+2.7%+2.0%
- FLHY 0.40%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- FLHY $1.23B
- SCYB $2.8B
- FLHY +2.7%, better
- SCYB +2.0%
- FLHY 6.72%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- FLHY 294
- SCYB 1844
- FLHY 269K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- FLHY $23.45
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLHY | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B58 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C52 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | A80 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | B61 | A99Higher |
| Durability | A71Higher | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. FLHY and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLHYA
SCYBA
In short
FLHY Franklin's high yield ETF is income-first by charter: the prospectus puts current income at the top and capital appreciation a distant second. About 300 corporate bonds, monthly payouts, category-median cost.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
FLHY The Fund seeks high current income and, secondarily, capital appreciation when consistent with its primary income goal.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLHY vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLHY vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying FLHY vs SCYB
$7,452
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLHY 0.40%
$8,090
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLHY | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $55 | $668 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $216 | $2,577 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $638 | $7,452 |
- 0.40%FLHY
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
FLHY 37th cheapest of 84 funds
FLHY vs SCYB Dividends
- FLHY 6.72%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- FLHY $1.58
- SCYB $1.80
- FLHY $0.14
- SCYB $0.16
- FLHY Oct 1, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- FLHY Oct 6, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- FLHY Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
FLHY vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLHY 4.5%, betterSCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLHY 0.98, betterSCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- FLHY −15.2%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FLHY 0.61SCYB 0.28
FLHY and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
