SCHZ ranks 2nd and FLIA 56th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
FLIA vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.22pt a year
0.25%0.03%
SCHZ 8.1×the volume
291K2.37M
FLIA +1.2pt
+1.0%−0.2%
FLIA vs SCHZ Performance
+5.1%−1.0%
- FLIA 0.25%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- FLIA $436M
- SCHZ $10.8B
- FLIA +1.0%, better
- SCHZ −0.2%
- FLIA 3.24%
- SCHZ 4.27%, better
- FLIA 99
- SCHZ 12610
- FLIA 291K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- FLIA $20.19
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLIA | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B64 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B69Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | B56 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | A78Higher |
| Durability | B64 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. FLIA and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLIAB
SCHZA
In short
FLIA Bonds from everywhere except America, with the currency swings hedged away. FLIA holds non-dollar debt against the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Hedged benchmark, at a fee below what the typical aggregate bond ETF charges.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
FLIA The Fund seeks total return through an international aggregate fixed-income strategy. Its mandate includes exposure to non-U.S.-dollar-denominated securities and currency-management techniques intended to hedge foreign-currency exposure.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLIA vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLIA vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying FLIA vs SCHZ
$4,521
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLIA 0.25%
$5,159
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLIA | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $55 | $400 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $216 | $1,553 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $638 | $4,521 |
- 0.25%FLIA
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
FLIA 39th cheapest of 114 funds
FLIA vs SCHZ Dividends
- FLIA 3.24%
- SCHZ 4.27%, better
- FLIA $0.66
- SCHZ $0.96
- FLIA $0.07
- SCHZ $0.08
- FLIA Oct 1, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- FLIA Oct 6, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- FLIA Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
FLIA vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLIA
- SCHZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLIA 3.5%, betterSCHZ 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLIA −0.15SCHZ 0.17, better
- Worst fall
- FLIA −8.8%, betterSCHZ −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FLIA 0.46SCHZ 0.99
FLIA and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
