FLJH ranks 3rd and HEWJ 16th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.
FLJH vs HEWJ
FLJH −0.93pt a year
0.09%1.02%
HEWJ 1.8×the volume
34.3K62.6K
FLJH +0.2pt
+20.7%+20.5%
FLJH vs HEWJ Performance
+156.4%+153.8%
- FLJH 0.09%, better
- HEWJ 1.02%
- FLJH $201M
- HEWJ $625M
- FLJH +21.9%
- HEWJ +22.4%, better
- FLJH 6.20%, better
- HEWJ 4.18%
- FLJH 448
- HEWJ 171
- FLJH 34.3K sh
- HEWJ 62.6K sh, better
- FLJH $44.77
- HEWJ $62.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLJH | HEWJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F9 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B62Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | C52 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | A74Higher | C52 |
| Durability | C53 | A76Higher |
Rank among Japan funds
Same Category. FLJH and HEWJ are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLJHA
HEWJC
In short
FLJH Japan stocks with the yen taken out of the equation. FLJH hedges the currency back to dollars for 0.09% a year, the same fee as Franklin's unhedged twin and a fraction of the typical Japan fund.
HEWJ Japanese stocks with the yen taken out of the equation. Since 2014, HEWJ has tracked MSCI's 100% USD-hedged Japan index, so what drives the fund is the Japanese market, not the currency.
Stated mandate
FLJH The Fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE Japan Capped Hedged Index through passive indexing, using replication or representative sampling.
HEWJ The fund seeks to track an index of Japanese equities while reducing the effect of yen currency fluctuations.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLJH vs HEWJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLJH vs HEWJ Cost
Overpaying HEWJ vs FLJH
$17,114
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLJH 0.09%
$1,898
HEWJ 1.02%
$19,012
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLJH | HEWJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $1,797 | $1,632 |
| 20 | $646 | $6,746 | $6,100 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $19,012 | $17,114 |
- 0.09%FLJH, cheaper
- 1.02%HEWJ
- Middle half of Japan funds
- Median 0.54%
FLJH cheapest of 18 funds
HEWJ 17th cheapest of 18 funds
FLJH vs HEWJ Dividends
- FLJH 6.20%, better
- HEWJ 4.18%
- FLJH $2.74
- HEWJ $2.61
- FLJH $0.29
- HEWJ $0.35
- FLJH Jun 26, 2026
- HEWJ Jul 2, 2026
- FLJH Jul 6, 2026
- HEWJ Jul 8, 2026
- FLJH Twice a year
- HEWJ Twice a year
Distribution history
FLJH vs HEWJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLJH
- HEWJ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLJH 12.5%HEWJ 12.5%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- FLJH 1.59, betterHEWJ 1.58
- Worst fall
- FLJH −20.4%, betterHEWJ −20.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FLJH 0.62HEWJ 0.41
FLJH and HEWJ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


