Skip to content

FLJH vs JPAN

Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF

FLJHANYSE Arca

Matthews Japan Active ETF JPAN

JPANCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FLJH −0.70pt a year

FLJH0.09%JPAN0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

FLJH 23.7×the volume

FLJH34.4KJPAN1.45K

3Y return · a year

FLJH +3.3pt

FLJH+25.6%JPAN+22.3%

FLJH vs JPAN Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+22.2%FLJH+15.4%JPAN

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. FLJH +22.2%. JPAN +15.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%30%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FLJH 0.09%, better
JPAN 0.79%
Fund size
FLJH $188M
JPAN $11M
1Y total return
FLJH +22.2%, better
JPAN +15.4%
Yield (12M)
FLJH 6.22%, better
JPAN 4.45%
Holdings
FLJH 447
JPAN 52
Avg volume (30D)
FLJH 34.4K sh, better
JPAN 1.45K sh
NAV per share
FLJH $41.82
JPAN $38.73
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FLJH: Cost 97, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 49, Holdings 74, Durability 54. JPAN: Cost 26, Risk 44, Mission 100, Tradability 7, Holdings 35, Durability 26.
Pillar letters and Scores for FLJH, JPAN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFLJHJPAN
Cost30% weightA97HigherD26
Mission25% weightNot scoredA100
Risk15% weightB64HigherC44
Tradability15% weightC49HigherF7
Holdings10% weightA74HigherD35
Durability5% weightC54HigherD26

Rank among Japan funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FLJH and JPAN are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Japan⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

FLJH ranks 4th and JPAN 14th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.

  1. Rank 1AFLJPFranklin FTSE Japan ETFScore 83
  2. Rank 2ABBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 3ASCJiShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 4AFLJHFranklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETFScore 74
  5. Rank 4AJPXNiShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETFScore 74
  6. Rank 12CJPYLazard Japanese Equity ETFScore 49
  7. Rank 14CJPANMatthews Japan Active ETF JPANScore 45
  8. Rank 15CMJSCMUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETFScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FLJHAFranklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF

JPANCMatthews Japan Active ETF JPAN

In short

FLJH Japan stocks with the yen taken out of the equation. FLJH hedges the currency back to dollars for 0.09% a year, the same fee as Franklin's unhedged twin and a fraction of the typical Japan fund.

JPAN The Japan aisle is stacked with cheap index trackers. JPAN is the other thing: an active, stock-picked Japan portfolio from an Asia-only shop, launched in 2023 and priced like the research effort it is.

Stated mandate

FLJH The Fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE Japan Capped Hedged Index through passive indexing, using replication or representative sampling.

JPAN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

  • FLJH 0.09% a year. Currency hedging usually carries a surcharge; here it costs the same as Franklin's unhedged FLJP and far less than the median Japan fund.
  • The hedge is the whole point: it aims to strip out yen-dollar moves so what you own is Japanese share prices, not a bet on the currency.
  • Broad and deliberately un-top-heavy: roughly 500 Japanese companies tracked through a capped index, so no single name can swell into an outsized slice.
  • Live since 2017 and one of the stronger builds in a crowded Japan peer group of index trackers.
  • JPAN Actively managed by Matthews, a firm built around Asia, with one stated job: long-term capital appreciation from Japanese equities.
  • The portfolio stays inside the Japan mandate on the label, with no drift into the wider Asia-Pacific region.
  • Standard 1940 Act fund structure: no leverage, no commodity-pool plumbing, no derivative overlay to decode.

Worth knowing

  • FLJH The hedge cuts both ways. When the yen strengthens against the dollar, you give up the tailwind an unhedged Japan fund would capture.
  • Thinly traded and small next to the Japan heavyweights, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than headline fee comparisons suggest.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly or quarterly, so income arrives in lumps.
  • JPAN At 0.79% a year it sits well above the typical Japan ETF, where index rivals like FLJP (0.09%) and BBJP (0.19%) set the floor.
  • A small, thinly traded fund, so spreads can run wider than the giant index names in the same aisle.
  • Launched in 2023, so the record is short, and cash comes back once or twice a year rather than quarterly.

Full FLJH profile⁠

Full JPAN profile⁠

FLJH vs JPAN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FLJH vs JPAN Cost

Overpaying JPAN vs FLJH

$13,276

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FLJH 0.09%

    $1,898

  • JPAN 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FLJH 0.09%
  • JPAN 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530JPAN $15,174FLJH $1,898

Year by year

YearFLJHJPANOverpaying
10$165$1,405$1,240
20$646$5,331$4,685
30$1,898$15,174$13,276

Expense ratio

  • 0.09%FLJH, cheaper
  • 0.79%JPAN
  • Middle half of Japan funds
  • Median 0.54%

FLJH cheapest of 18 funds

JPAN 13th cheapest of 18 funds

FLJH vs JPAN Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
FLJH 6.22%, better
JPAN 4.45%
Payout (12M)
FLJH $2.74
JPAN $1.83
Last payment
FLJH $0.29
JPAN $1.83
Ex-dividend
FLJH Jun 26, 2026
JPAN Dec 17, 2025
Paid on
FLJH Jul 6, 2026
JPAN Dec 22, 2025
Frequency
FLJH Twice a year
JPAN Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FLJHTwice a year · 13 paymentsAll FLJH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 13 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2017 $0.01; Jun 20, 2018 $0.01; Dec 20, 2018 $1.25; Dec 13, 2021 $0.41; Jun 17, 2022 $0.92; Dec 16, 2022 $5.55; Jun 16, 2023 $0.32; Dec 15, 2023 $6.38; Jun 21, 2024 $0.75; Dec 20, 2024 $0.83; Jun 20, 2025 $0.63; Dec 19, 2025 $2.45; Jun 26, 2026 $0.29. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD
JPANAnnual · 3 paymentsAll JPAN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 14, 2023 $0.13; Dec 18, 2024 $0.47; Dec 17, 2025 $1.83. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD

FLJH vs JPAN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FLJH 12.4%, betterJPAN 14.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FLJH 1.60, betterJPAN 1.20
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FLJH −20.4%JPAN −15.2%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FLJH 0.64JPAN 0.86

Popular comparisons

  • FLJHAvsFLJPA

    Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF · Franklin FTSE Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JPANCvsFLJPA

    Matthews Japan Active ETF JPAN · Franklin FTSE Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLJHAvsBBJPA

    Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF · JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JPANCvsBBJPA

    Matthews Japan Active ETF JPAN · JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLJHAvsSCJA

    Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF · iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JPANCvsSCJA

    Matthews Japan Active ETF JPAN · iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.