XCEM ranks 2nd and FLLA 13th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
FLLA vs XCEM
XCEM −0.03pt a year
0.19%0.16%
XCEM 6.0×the volume
27.1K162K
FLLA +1.8pt
+11.9%+10.1%
FLLA vs XCEM Performance
+75.3%+61.9%
- FLLA 0.19%
- XCEM 0.16%, better
- FLLA $102M
- XCEM $2.01B
- FLLA +14.3%
- XCEM +24.3%, better
- FLLA 5.11%, better
- XCEM 2.68%
- FLLA 135
- XCEM 465
- FLLA 27.1K sh
- XCEM 162K sh, better
- FLLA $25.52
- XCEM $46.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLLA | XCEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86 | A90Higher |
| Mission | C49 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D25 | C51Higher |
| Tradability | B65Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | C52 | B60Higher |
| Durability | C53 | A78Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. FLLA and XCEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLLAB
XCEMA
In short
FLLA A single-region slice of emerging markets: FLLA tracks the FTSE Latin America Capped Index, roughly 150 stocks, for 0.19% a year, while the typical fund in its emerging-markets peer group charges more than double that.
XCEM The original ex-China emerging markets fund. Columbia launched XCEM in 2015, back when carving China out of an EM sleeve was a fringe idea rather than a crowded shelf. Roughly 150 EM stocks, no China, 0.16% a year.
Stated mandate
FLLA The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE Latin America Capped Index through replication or representative sampling.
XCEM The fund seeks investment results that correspond to the performance of the EGAI Emerging Markets ex-China Index before fees and expenses. It generally invests at least 80% of net assets in index companies and seeks to replicate the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLLA vs XCEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLLA vs XCEM Cost
Overpaying FLLA vs XCEM
$610
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLLA 0.19%
$3,952
XCEM 0.16%
$3,342
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLLA | XCEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $292 | $55 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $1,141 | $210 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $3,342 | $610 |
- 0.19%FLLA
- 0.16%XCEM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
XCEM 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
FLLA 4th cheapest of 20 funds
FLLA vs XCEM Dividends
- FLLA 5.11%, better
- XCEM 2.68%
- FLLA $1.30
- XCEM $1.25
- FLLA $0.37
- XCEM $1.25
- FLLA Jun 26, 2026
- XCEM Dec 18, 2025
- FLLA Jul 6, 2026
- XCEM Dec 26, 2025
- FLLA Twice a year
- XCEM Annual
Distribution history
FLLA vs XCEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLLA
- XCEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLLA 19.5%, betterXCEM 20.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLLA 0.51XCEM 0.95, better
- Worst fall
- FLLA −28.3%, betterXCEM −29.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FLLA 0.99XCEM 1.27
FLLA and XCEM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





