PXH ranks 4th and FLN 10th of 10 funds in the Emerging Markets Factor Index Category.
FLN vs PXH
PXH −0.33pt a year
0.80%0.47%
PXH 18.3×the volume
12.2K223K
PXH +2.1pt
+6.2%+8.3%
FLN vs PXH Performance
+76.6%+59.1%
- FLN 0.80%
- PXH 0.47%, better
- FLN $40M
- PXH $1.94B
- FLN +13.6%, better
- PXH +13.1%
- FLN 4.02%
- PXH 4.13%, better
- FLN 54
- PXH 365
- FLN 12.2K sh
- PXH 223K sh, better
- FLN $23.54
- PXH $28.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLN | PXH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F14 | C44Higher |
| Mission | D27 | |
| Risk | F22 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | D28 | B55Higher |
| Durability | D29 | A76Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
Same Category. FLN and PXH are both graded against the same 10 Emerging Markets Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLNF
PXHB
In short
FLN Most Latin America funds just buy the region's biggest companies. FLN runs Latin American stocks through First Trust's AlphaDEX growth-and-value screen first, then holds the roughly 60 names that survive it.
PXH Most emerging-markets funds size positions by share price. PXH sizes them by economic footprint (sales, cash flow, dividends, book value), the fundamental-indexing approach it has run since 2007. A value-tilted EM portfolio built from the accounting statements up.
Stated mandate
FLN The fund seeks investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Latin America Index before fees and expenses.
PXH The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the RAFI strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLN vs PXH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLN vs PXH Cost
Overpaying FLN vs PXH
$5,928
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLN 0.80%
$15,346
PXH 0.47%
$9,418
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLN | PXH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $847 | $575 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $3,261 | $2,132 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $9,418 | $5,928 |
- 0.80%FLN
- 0.47%PXH, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
- Median 0.44%
PXH 6th cheapest of 10 funds
FLN 9th cheapest of 10 funds
FLN vs PXH Dividends
- FLN 4.02%
- PXH 4.13%, better
- FLN $0.95
- PXH $1.16
- FLN $0.15
- PXH $0.32
- FLN Sep 24, 2026
- PXH Sep 21, 2026
- FLN Sep 30, 2026
- PXH Sep 25, 2026
- FLN Quarterly
- PXH Quarterly
Distribution history
FLN vs PXH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLN
- PXH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLN 19.7%PXH 11.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FLN 0.59PXH 1.49, better
- Worst fall
- FLN −26.0%, betterPXH −29.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FLN 0.97PXH 0.76
FLN and PXH in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
