ILCV ranks 2nd and FLQM 40th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FLQM vs ILCV
ILCV −0.26pt a year
0.30%0.04%
FLQM 3.7×the volume
92.9K25.1K
ILCV +5.3pt
+7.2%+12.5%
FLQM vs ILCV Performance
+41.8%+79.9%
- FLQM 0.30%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- FLQM $1.45B
- ILCV $1.37B
- FLQM +14.5%
- ILCV +22.4%, better
- FLQM 1.57%, better
- ILCV 1.50%
- FLQM 207
- ILCV 374
- FLQM 92.9K sh, better
- ILCV 25.1K sh
- FLQM $61.52
- ILCV $108.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLQM | ILCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | A99Higher |
| Mission | B67 | A82Higher |
| Risk | C50 | A91Higher |
| Tradability | A72Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | D39 |
| Durability | B59 | A82Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FLQM and ILCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLQMB
ILCVA
In short
FLQM Multifactor investing usually stops at the mega caps. FLQM runs the full four-factor screen (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) through the middle of the US market, landing on roughly 120 names.
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
Stated mandate
FLQM The Fund uses a passive indexing approach to seek investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the U.S. Mid Cap Underlying Index.
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLQM vs ILCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLQM vs ILCV Cost
Overpaying FLQM vs ILCV
$5,300
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLQM 0.30%
$6,149
ILCV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLQM | ILCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $73 | $472 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $288 | $1,825 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $849 | $5,300 |
- 0.30%FLQM
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
FLQM 51st cheapest of 99 funds
FLQM vs ILCV Dividends
- FLQM 1.57%, better
- ILCV 1.50%
- FLQM $0.98
- ILCV $1.65
- FLQM $0.19
- ILCV $0.42
- FLQM Sep 18, 2026
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- FLQM Sep 25, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- FLQM Quarterly
- ILCV Quarterly
Distribution history
FLQM vs ILCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLQM
- ILCV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLQM 13.9%ILCV 10.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FLQM 0.81ILCV 1.57, better
- Worst fall
- FLQM −22.5%ILCV −18.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FLQM 0.81ILCV 0.82
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.