VYM ranks 2nd and FLQM 40th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FLQM vs VYM
VYM −0.26pt a year
0.30%0.04%
VYM 12.4×the volume
92.9K1.15M
VYM +4.1pt
+7.2%+11.3%
FLQM vs VYM Performance
+41.8%+70.4%
- FLQM 0.30%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- FLQM $1.45B
- VYM $78.9B
- FLQM +14.5%
- VYM +18.9%, better
- FLQM 1.57%
- VYM 2.26%, better
- FLQM 207
- VYM 610
- FLQM 92.9K sh
- VYM 1.15M sh, better
- FLQM $61.52
- VYM $159.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLQM | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | A99Higher |
| Mission | B67 | A81Higher |
| Risk | C50 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | A72Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | C53 |
| Durability | B59 | A94Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FLQM and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLQMB
VYMA
In short
FLQM Multifactor investing usually stops at the mega caps. FLQM runs the full four-factor screen (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) through the middle of the US market, landing on roughly 120 names.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
FLQM The Fund uses a passive indexing approach to seek investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the U.S. Mid Cap Underlying Index.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLQM vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLQM vs VYM Cost
Overpaying FLQM vs VYM
$5,300
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLQM 0.30%
$6,149
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLQM | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $73 | $472 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $288 | $1,825 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $849 | $5,300 |
- 0.30%FLQM
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
FLQM 51st cheapest of 99 funds
FLQM vs VYM Dividends
- FLQM 1.57%
- VYM 2.26%, better
- FLQM $0.98
- VYM $3.68
- FLQM $0.19
- VYM $0.89
- FLQM Sep 18, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- FLQM Sep 25, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- FLQM Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
FLQM vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLQM
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLQM 13.9%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FLQM 0.81VYM 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- FLQM −22.5%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FLQM 0.81VYM 0.74
FLQM and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


