VONV ranks 1st and FLQM 40th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FLQM vs VONV
VONV −0.24pt a year
0.30%0.06%
VONV 8.4×the volume
92.9K776K
VONV +4.5pt
+7.2%+11.7%
FLQM vs VONV Performance
+41.8%+73.9%
- FLQM 0.30%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- FLQM $1.45B
- VONV $21.7B
- FLQM +14.5%
- VONV +30.6%, better
- FLQM 1.57%, better
- VONV 1.51%
- FLQM 207
- VONV 887
- FLQM 92.9K sh
- VONV 776K sh, better
- FLQM $61.52
- VONV $112.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLQM | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | A96Higher |
| Mission | B67 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C50 | A89Higher |
| Tradability | A72Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | C49 |
| Durability | B59 | A92Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FLQM and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLQMB
VONVA
In short
FLQM Multifactor investing usually stops at the mega caps. FLQM runs the full four-factor screen (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) through the middle of the US market, landing on roughly 120 names.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
FLQM The Fund uses a passive indexing approach to seek investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the U.S. Mid Cap Underlying Index.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLQM vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLQM vs VONV Cost
Overpaying FLQM vs VONV
$4,879
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLQM 0.30%
$6,149
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLQM | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $110 | $435 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $432 | $1,681 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $1,270 | $4,879 |
- 0.30%FLQM
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
FLQM 51st cheapest of 99 funds
FLQM vs VONV Dividends
- FLQM 1.57%, better
- VONV 1.51%
- FLQM $0.98
- VONV $1.74
- FLQM $0.19
- VONV $0.42
- FLQM Sep 18, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- FLQM Sep 25, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- FLQM Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
FLQM vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLQM
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLQM 13.9%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FLQM 0.81VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- FLQM −22.5%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FLQM 0.81VONV 0.85
FLQM and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

