FLSP ranks 1st and QIS 23rd of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
FLSP vs QIS
FLSP −0.48pt a year
0.65%1.13%
FLSP 16.6×the volume
153K9.23K
FLSP +37.7pt
+11.3%−26.4%
FLSP vs QIS Performance
+12.5%−49.5%
- FLSP 0.65%, better
- QIS 1.13%
- FLSP $1.2B
- QIS $42M
- FLSP +12.5%, better
- QIS −49.5%
- FLSP 2.43%
- QIS 6.64%, better
- FLSP 287
- QIS 20
- FLSP 153K sh, better
- QIS 9.23K sh
- FLSP $29.00
- QIS $9.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLSP | QIS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | C52 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B68Higher | F1 |
| Tradability | C54Higher | F23 |
| Holdings | A82 | |
| Durability | A85Higher | B61 |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. FLSP and QIS are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLSPA
QISD
In short
FLSP A hedge-fund style trade in an ETF wrapper. FLSP goes long and short across value, momentum and carry rather than just owning cheap stocks, which makes it the odd one out in a cohort of long-only factor funds.
QIS Investment banks build quant 'risk premia' strategies for pensions and hedge funds. QIS packages a basket of those third-party strategies into an ETF, using total return swaps, aiming for returns that move independently of stocks and bonds.
Stated mandate
FLSP The fund uses a top-down risk-premia strategy focused on value, momentum, and carry factors, taking both long and short positions.
QIS The fund seeks positive absolute returns and income by investing in a diversified portfolio of quantitative strategies intended to provide an uncorrelated positive source of returns.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLSP vs QIS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLSP vs QIS Cost
Overpaying QIS vs FLSP
$8,047
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLSP 0.65%
$12,717
QIS 1.13%
$20,764
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLSP | QIS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,981 | $818 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $7,403 | $2,963 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $20,764 | $8,047 |
- 0.65%FLSP, cheaper
- 1.13%QIS
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
FLSP 3rd cheapest of 29 funds
QIS 15th cheapest of 29 funds
FLSP vs QIS Dividends
- FLSP 2.43%
- QIS 6.64%, better
- FLSP $0.71
- QIS $0.60
- FLSP $0.71
- QIS $0.50
- FLSP Dec 19, 2025
- QIS Sep 25, 2026
- FLSP Dec 29, 2025
- QIS Sep 30, 2026
- FLSP Annual
- QIS Twice a year
Distribution history
FLSP vs QIS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLSP 6.8%, betterQIS 21.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLSP 0.87, betterQIS −1.18
- Worst fall
- FLSP −9.5%QIS −63.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FLSP 0.01QIS 0.52
FLSP and QIS in the news
Category Review
The largest alternatives fund has no one-year record

Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.