QAI ranks 3rd and QIS 23rd of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
QAI vs QIS
QAI −0.32pt a year
0.81%1.13%
QAI 6.3×the volume
58.2K9.23K
QAI +35.1pt
+8.7%−26.4%
QAI vs QIS Performance
+7.5%−49.5%
- QAI 0.81%, better
- QIS 1.13%
- QAI $985M
- QIS $42M
- QAI +7.5%, better
- QIS −49.5%
- QAI 1.41%
- QIS 6.64%, better
- QAI 66
- QIS 20
- QAI 58.2K sh, better
- QIS 9.23K sh
- QAI $35.29
- QIS $9.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QAI | QIS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86Higher | C52 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A71Higher | F1 |
| Tradability | A81Higher | F23 |
| Holdings | C45 | |
| Durability | A84Higher | B61 |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. QAI and QIS are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QAIA
QISD
In short
QAI The original hedge fund replication ETF, listed in 2009: a fund of roughly 50 exchange-traded products tracking an index built to mimic hedge fund styles, for 0.81% net of a fee waiver (1.03% gross).
QIS Investment banks build quant 'risk premia' strategies for pensions and hedge funds. QIS packages a basket of those third-party strategies into an ETF, using total return swaps, aiming for returns that move independently of stocks and bonds.
Stated mandate
QAI The Fund seeks to track the performance of the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index before fees and expenses. It uses passive indexing and invests primarily in exchange-traded products and related financial instruments representing the index.
QIS The fund seeks positive absolute returns and income by investing in a diversified portfolio of quantitative strategies intended to provide an uncorrelated positive source of returns.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QAI vs QIS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QAI vs QIS Cost
Overpaying QIS vs QAI
$5,246
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QAI 0.81%
$15,518
QIS 1.13%
$20,764
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QAI | QIS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,439 | $1,981 | $542 |
| 20 | $5,456 | $7,403 | $1,947 |
| 30 | $15,518 | $20,764 | $5,246 |
- 0.81%QAI, cheaper
- 1.13%QIS
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
QAI 5th cheapest of 29 funds
QIS 15th cheapest of 29 funds
QAI vs QIS Dividends
- QAI 1.41%
- QIS 6.64%, better
- QAI $0.50
- QIS $0.60
- QAI $0.50
- QIS $0.50
- QAI Dec 30, 2025
- QIS Sep 25, 2026
- QAI Jan 5, 2026
- QIS Sep 30, 2026
- QAI Annual
- QIS Twice a year
Distribution history
QAI vs QIS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QAI 5.2%, betterQIS 21.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- QAI 0.81, betterQIS −1.18
- Worst fall
- QAI −14.1%QIS −63.5%
- Market sensitivity
- QAI 0.36QIS 0.52
QAI and QIS in the news
Category Review
The largest alternatives fund has no one-year record

Popular comparisons
- 0.81% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.