QALT ranks 4th and QIS 23rd of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
QALT vs QIS
QALT −0.33pt a year
0.80%1.13%
QALT 1.9×the volume
17.7K9.23K
QALT vs QIS Performance
+6.9%−49.5%
- QALT 0.80%, better
- QIS 1.13%
- QALT $194M
- QIS $42M
- QALT +6.9%, better
- QIS −49.5%
- QALT
- QIS 6.64%
- QALT 27
- QIS 20
- QALT 17.7K sh, better
- QIS 9.23K sh
- QALT $25.77
- QIS $9.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QALT | QIS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | C52 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A70Higher | F1 |
| Tradability | B59Higher | F23 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B64Higher | B61 |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. QALT and QIS are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QALTA
QISD
In short
QALT One ticker, several hedge fund playbooks: SEI stacks sub-advisers running directional, event-driven and arbitrage strategies, and measures itself against 3-month T-bills instead of the S&P 500. It undercuts the typical alternatives fund on fees.
QIS Investment banks build quant 'risk premia' strategies for pensions and hedge funds. QIS packages a basket of those third-party strategies into an ETF, using total return swaps, aiming for returns that move independently of stocks and bonds.
Stated mandate
QALT The fund seeks positive absolute returns across market cycles with reduced correlation to stocks and bonds. It pursues this through multiple underlying funds and sub-advisers using directional or tactical, event-driven, and arbitrage approaches.
QIS The fund seeks positive absolute returns and income by investing in a diversified portfolio of quantitative strategies intended to provide an uncorrelated positive source of returns.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QALT vs QIS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QALT vs QIS Cost
Overpaying QIS vs QALT
$5,418
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QALT 0.80%
$15,346
QIS 1.13%
$20,764
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QALT | QIS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $1,981 | $559 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $7,403 | $2,010 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $20,764 | $5,418 |
- 0.80%QALT, cheaper
- 1.13%QIS
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
QALT 4th cheapest of 29 funds
QIS 15th cheapest of 29 funds
QALT vs QIS Dividends
- QALT
- QIS 6.64%
- QALT
- QIS $0.60
- QALT $0.17
- QIS $0.50
- QALT Oct 5, 2026
- QIS Sep 25, 2026
- QALT Oct 6, 2026
- QIS Sep 30, 2026
- QALT Quarterly
- QIS Twice a year
Distribution history
QALT vs QIS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QALT 7.2%QIS 21.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- QALT 0.77QIS −1.18
- Worst fall
- QALT −4.9%QIS −63.5%
- Market sensitivity
- QALT 0.24QIS 0.52
QALT and QIS in the news
Category Review
The largest alternatives fund has no one-year record

Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.