Skip to content

FMAR vs SIXJ

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March

FMARCCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

SIXJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

SIXJ −0.11pt a year

FMAR0.85%SIXJ0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

SIXJ 1.2×the volume

FMAR12.3KSIXJ15.1K

3Y return · a year

FMAR +0.6pt

FMAR+15.5%SIXJ+14.9%

FMAR vs SIXJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+14.8%FMAR+10.5%SIXJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FMAR +14.8%. SIXJ +10.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FMAR 0.85%
SIXJ 0.74%, better
Fund size
FMAR $1.22B
SIXJ $149M
1Y total return
FMAR +14.8%, better
SIXJ +10.5%
Holdings
FMAR 3
SIXJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
FMAR 12.3K sh
SIXJ 15.1K sh, better
NAV per share
FMAR $53.62
SIXJ $37.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FMAR: Cost 11, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 64, Holdings 63, Durability 82. SIXJ: Cost 68, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 70, Holdings 53, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for FMAR, SIXJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFMARSIXJ
Cost30% weightF11B68Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA76HigherB67
Tradability15% weightB64A70Higher
Holdings10% weightB63HigherC53
Durability5% weightA82HigherB57

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FMAR and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

SIXJ ranks 4th and FMAR 44th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 3BTENJiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 5BBUFMAB Moderate Buffer ETFScore 64
  6. Rank 44CFJULFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - JulyScore 46
  7. Rank 44CFMARFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - MarchScore 46
  8. Rank 44CFMAYFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - MayScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FMARCFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March

SIXJBAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

In short

FMAR The March seat in First Trust's twelve-month buffer ladder. It holds SPY-linked options built to absorb the first 10% of a year's losses, in exchange for a ceiling on gains that resets every March.

SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.

Stated mandate

FMAR The Fund seeks to track the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, subject to an upside cap and protection against an initial portion of losses during the stated outcome period.

SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.

Why people hold it

  • FMAR The mechanism is legible: over each one-year outcome period it targets the first 10% of SPY's decline as a cushion, giving up gains above a cap struck at the March reset.
  • Twelve monthly siblings run the same playbook (FJAN, FAPR, FSEP and the rest), so a start month is a choice, or you can ladder several and stop leaning on one reset date.
  • Running since 2021 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, with the reference asset being the SPY trust itself rather than a bespoke index, inside a standard 1940 Act ETF wrapper.
  • SIXJ The 10% buffer and the cap reset every January 1 and July 1, so terms refresh twice a year instead of on the usual annual clock.
  • 0.74% expense ratio, on the lean side for a defined-outcome fund and below the typical fee among its shallow-buffer peers.
  • The reference asset is SPY itself, the original S&P 500 ETF, so the payoff is keyed to a plain vanilla benchmark rather than a bespoke index.
  • Rates among the stronger implementations in a crowded shallow-buffer field, alongside AllianzIM's other six-month siblings like SIXZ and SIXD.

Worth knowing

  • FMAR 0.85% a year sits at the pricier end of the buffer shelf. Laddered alternatives are cheaper, with BUFB listed at 0.10%.
  • The 10% buffer and the cap belong to a full outcome period. Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever cushion and headroom remain, not the headline terms.
  • It trades thinly and hasn't been paying distributions, so limit orders earn their keep and any return has to show up in the share price.
  • SIXJ Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full six-month period. Buy mid-period and you get whatever cushion and upside room remain at that moment.
  • It tracks SPY's share-price return, so dividends aren't passed through and the fund isn't structured to pay income.
  • Volume is light next to the largest buffer funds, so bid-ask spreads can run wider, especially in fast-moving markets.

Full FMAR profile⁠

Full SIXJ profile⁠

FMAR vs SIXJ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FMAR vs SIXJ Cost

Overpaying FMAR vs SIXJ

$1,892

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FMAR 0.85%

    $16,199

  • SIXJ 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FMAR 0.85%
  • SIXJ 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FMAR $16,199SIXJ $14,307

Year by year

YearFMARSIXJOverpaying
10$1,508$1,319$189
20$5,706$5,015$691
30$16,199$14,307$1,892

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%FMAR
  • 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds

FMAR 60th cheapest of 77 funds

FMAR vs SIXJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
FMAR None
SIXJ None

Distribution history

FMARAll FMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SIXJAll SIXJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FMAR vs SIXJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FMAR 6.6%SIXJ 5.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FMAR 1.57SIXJ 1.67, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FMAR −14.4%SIXJ −14.1%since Jan 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FMAR 0.50SIXJ 0.46

FMAR and SIXJ in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FMARCvsZALTA

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FMARCvsAUGPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FMARCvsTENJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.