SIXJ ranks 4th and FMAR 44th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
FMAR vs SIXJ
SIXJ −0.11pt a year
0.85%0.74%
SIXJ 1.2×the volume
12.3K15.1K
FMAR +0.6pt
+15.5%+14.9%
FMAR vs SIXJ Performance
+14.8%+10.5%
- FMAR 0.85%
- SIXJ 0.74%, better
- FMAR $1.22B
- SIXJ $149M
- FMAR +14.8%, better
- SIXJ +10.5%
- FMAR 3
- SIXJ 3
- FMAR 12.3K sh
- SIXJ 15.1K sh, better
- FMAR $53.62
- SIXJ $37.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FMAR | SIXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | B68Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A76Higher | B67 |
| Tradability | B64 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | B63Higher | C53 |
| Durability | A82Higher | B57 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. FMAR and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FMARC
SIXJB
In short
FMAR The March seat in First Trust's twelve-month buffer ladder. It holds SPY-linked options built to absorb the first 10% of a year's losses, in exchange for a ceiling on gains that resets every March.
SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.
Stated mandate
FMAR The Fund seeks to track the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, subject to an upside cap and protection against an initial portion of losses during the stated outcome period.
SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FMAR vs SIXJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FMAR vs SIXJ Cost
Overpaying FMAR vs SIXJ
$1,892
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FMAR 0.85%
$16,199
SIXJ 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FMAR | SIXJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,319 | $189 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,015 | $691 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $14,307 | $1,892 |
- 0.85%FMAR
- 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds
FMAR 60th cheapest of 77 funds
FMAR vs SIXJ Dividends
- FMAR None
- SIXJ None
Distribution history
FMAR vs SIXJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FMAR 6.6%SIXJ 5.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FMAR 1.57SIXJ 1.67, better
- Worst fall
- FMAR −14.4%SIXJ −14.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FMAR 0.50SIXJ 0.46
FMAR and SIXJ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
