Skip to content

FMAR vs XTR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March

FMARCCboe

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XTR −0.60pt a year

FMAR0.85%XTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

FMAR 7.5×the volume

FMAR12.3KXTR1.64K

5Y return · a year

FMAR +1.5pt

FMAR+10.4%XTR+8.9%

FMAR vs XTR Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+63.9%FMAR+53.3%XTR

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FMAR +63.9%. XTR +53.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FMAR 0.85%
XTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
FMAR $1.22B
XTR $5M
1Y total return
FMAR +14.8%, better
XTR +7.9%
Yield (12M)
FMAR No data
XTR 16.45%
Holdings
FMAR 3
XTR 506
Avg volume (30D)
FMAR 12.3K sh, better
XTR 1.64K sh
NAV per share
FMAR $53.62
XTR $28.54
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FMAR: Cost 11, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 64, Holdings 63, Durability 82. XTR: Cost 100, Risk 18, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 85, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for FMAR, XTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFMARXTR
Cost30% weightF11A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA76HigherF18
Tradability15% weightB64HigherF13
Holdings10% weightB63A85Higher
Durability5% weightA82HigherC46

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FMAR and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

FMAR ranks 44th and XTR 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 44CFJULFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - JulyScore 46
  2. Rank 44CFMARFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - MarchScore 46
  3. Rank 44CFMAYFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - MayScore 46
  4. Rank 57CXIDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - DecemberScore 40
  5. Rank 57CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FMARCFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

In short

FMAR The March seat in First Trust's twelve-month buffer ladder. It holds SPY-linked options built to absorb the first 10% of a year's losses, in exchange for a ceiling on gains that resets every March.

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

Stated mandate

FMAR The Fund seeks to track the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, subject to an upside cap and protection against an initial portion of losses during the stated outcome period.

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • FMAR The mechanism is legible: over each one-year outcome period it targets the first 10% of SPY's decline as a cushion, giving up gains above a cap struck at the March reset.
  • Twelve monthly siblings run the same playbook (FJAN, FAPR, FSEP and the rest), so a start month is a choice, or you can ladder several and stop leaning on one reset date.
  • Running since 2021 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, with the reference asset being the SPY trust itself rather than a bespoke index, inside a standard 1940 Act ETF wrapper.
  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • FMAR 0.85% a year sits at the pricier end of the buffer shelf. Laddered alternatives are cheaper, with BUFB listed at 0.10%.
  • The 10% buffer and the cap belong to a full outcome period. Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever cushion and headroom remain, not the headline terms.
  • It trades thinly and hasn't been paying distributions, so limit orders earn their keep and any return has to show up in the share price.
  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.

Full FMAR profile⁠

Full XTR profile⁠

FMAR vs XTR Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FMAR vs XTR Cost

Overpaying FMAR vs XTR

$11,040

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FMAR 0.85%

    $16,199

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FMAR 0.85%
  • XTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FMAR $16,199XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearFMARXTROverpaying
10$1,508$455$1,053
20$5,706$1,769$3,937
30$16,199$5,159$11,040

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%FMAR
  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

FMAR 60th cheapest of 77 funds

FMAR vs XTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FMAR No data
XTR 16.45%
Payout (12M)
FMAR None
XTR $4.69
Last payment
FMAR No data
XTR $0.08
Ex-dividend
FMAR No data
XTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
FMAR No data
XTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
FMAR No data
XTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

FMARAll FMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

FMAR vs XTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FMAR
  • XTR
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XTR −20.8% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FMAR 6.6%, betterXTR 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FMAR 1.57, betterXTR 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FMAR −14.4%, betterXTR −20.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FMAR 0.50XTR 0.94

FMAR and XTR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FMARCvsZALTA

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsZALTA

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FMARCvsAUGPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FMARCvsTENJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsTENJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.