Skip to content

FMAY vs XTR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May

FMAYCCboe

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XTR −0.60pt a year

FMAY0.85%XTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

FMAY 15.7×the volume

FMAY25.8KXTR1.64K

5Y return · a year

XTR +0.2pt

FMAY+8.7%XTR+8.9%

FMAY vs XTR Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+51.5%FMAY+53.3%XTR

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FMAY +51.5%. XTR +53.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FMAY 0.85%
XTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
FMAY $1.47B
XTR $5M
1Y total return
FMAY +8.5%, better
XTR +7.9%
Yield (12M)
FMAY No data
XTR 16.45%
Holdings
FMAY 3
XTR 506
Avg volume (30D)
FMAY 25.8K sh, better
XTR 1.64K sh
NAV per share
FMAY $57.09
XTR $28.54
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FMAY: Cost 11, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 84, Holdings 64, Durability 86. XTR: Cost 100, Risk 18, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 85, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for FMAY, XTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFMAYXTR
Cost30% weightF11A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC53HigherF18
Tradability15% weightA84HigherF13
Holdings10% weightB64A85Higher
Durability5% weightA86HigherC46

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FMAY and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

FMAY ranks 44th and XTR 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 44CFMARFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - MarchScore 46
  2. Rank 44CFMAYFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - MayScore 46
  3. Rank 49CDHDGFT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETFScore 45
  4. Rank 57CXIDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - DecemberScore 40
  5. Rank 57CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FMAYCFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

In short

FMAY First Trust's May rung on a twelve-month buffer ladder: it absorbs the first 10% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's price losses over a one-year stretch, trades that cushion for an upside cap, then resets every May.

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

Stated mandate

FMAY The Fund seeks pre-fee, pre-expense returns linked to the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, subject to a 17.09% upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses during the current May outcome period.

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • FMAY Mechanically simple: across each one-year period it seeks to absorb the first 10% of the reference ETF's price decline, in exchange for an upside cap set at the May reset.ftportfolios.com
  • Twelve monthly siblings (FJAN through FDEC) run the same 10% buffer on the same reference ETF, so entries can be laddered or rolled into a fresh period in any month.ftportfolios.com
  • Built from exchange-listed FLEX options inside an ETF wrapper: daily liquidity, no surrender schedule, no minimum holding term.sec.govftportfolios.com
  • Seasoned by buffer-fund standards: running since 2020 and carrying over a billion dollars, which puts it among the larger, longer-lived funds in this niche.
  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • FMAY At 0.85% a year it costs more than the typical fund in its buffer peer group, and laddered alternatives such as BUFB charge a fraction of that.
  • It follows price return only, so the reference ETF's dividends are left out, and the stated cap and buffer are quoted before fees and expenses.sec.gov
  • Cap and buffer are designed for holders across the full outcome period; buy mid-period and your own numbers differ. Each May's new cap depends on market rates at the reset.ftportfolios.comsec.gov
  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.

Full FMAY profile⁠

Full XTR profile⁠

FMAY vs XTR Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FMAY vs XTR Cost

Overpaying FMAY vs XTR

$11,040

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FMAY 0.85%

    $16,199

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FMAY 0.85%
  • XTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FMAY $16,199XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearFMAYXTROverpaying
10$1,508$455$1,053
20$5,706$1,769$3,937
30$16,199$5,159$11,040

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%FMAY
  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

FMAY 60th cheapest of 77 funds

FMAY vs XTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FMAY No data
XTR 16.45%
Payout (12M)
FMAY None
XTR $4.69
Last payment
FMAY No data
XTR $0.08
Ex-dividend
FMAY No data
XTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
FMAY No data
XTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
FMAY No data
XTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

FMAYAll FMAY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

FMAY vs XTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FMAY
  • XTR
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XTR −20.8% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FMAY 7.1%, betterXTR 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FMAY 1.37, betterXTR 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FMAY −13.6%, betterXTR −20.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FMAY 0.58XTR 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • FMAYCvsZALTA

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsZALTA

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FMAYCvsAUGPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FMAYCvsTENJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsTENJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.