FNDC ranks 4th and WSML 6th of 16 funds in the International Small-Cap Category.
FNDC vs WSML
WSML −0.09pt a year
0.39%0.30%
FNDC 5.6×the volume
92.6K16.5K
FNDC vs WSML Performance
+15.6%+16.4%
- FNDC 0.39%
- WSML 0.30%, better
- FNDC $3.04B
- WSML $660M
- FNDC +15.6%
- WSML +16.4%, better
- FNDC 3.66%, better
- WSML 2.84%
- FNDC 1581
- WSML 3686
- FNDC 92.6K sh, better
- WSML 16.5K sh
- FNDC $49.16
- WSML $34.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FNDC | WSML |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A88 |
| Risk | B62 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | A71Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | B60 | A74Higher |
| Durability | B64Higher | C49 |
Rank among International Small-Cap funds
Same Category. FNDC and WSML are both graded against the same 16 International Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FNDCA
WSMLA
In short
FNDC Schwab's contrarian cut of international small caps: instead of letting share price set position size, FNDC weights roughly 1,600 developed-market small companies by fundamental measures of size, which bakes in a value tilt.
WSML One ticker for small caps across the whole developed world, US included. Most funds on this shelf stop at the water's edge; WSML holds the full map, at 0.30% a year.
Stated mandate
FNDC The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index measuring small non-U.S. developed-market companies according to fundamental size and weighting.
WSML The Fund seeks to track an index composed of small-capitalization equities from developed markets globally.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FNDC vs WSML Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FNDC vs WSML Cost
Overpaying FNDC vs WSML
$1,749
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FNDC 0.39%
$7,898
WSML 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FNDC | WSML | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $545 | $160 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $2,113 | $612 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $6,149 | $1,749 |
- 0.39%FNDC
- 0.30%WSML, cheaper
- Middle half of International Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.44%
WSML 3rd cheapest of 16 funds
FNDC 4th cheapest of 16 funds
FNDC vs WSML Dividends
- FNDC 3.66%, better
- WSML 2.84%
- FNDC $1.80
- WSML $0.97
- FNDC $0.28
- WSML $0.29
- FNDC Jun 24, 2026
- WSML Jun 15, 2026
- FNDC Jun 29, 2026
- WSML Jun 18, 2026
- FNDC Twice a year
- WSML Twice a year
Distribution history
FNDC vs WSML Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FNDC 13.3%WSML 13.3%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- FNDC 1.14WSML 1.46
- Worst fall
- FNDC −30.8%WSML −10.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FNDC 1.04WSML 0.89
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.