SCZ ranks 1st and WSML 6th of 16 funds in the International Small-Cap Category.
SCZ vs WSML
WSML −0.10pt a year
0.40%0.30%
SCZ 78.8×the volume
1.3M16.5K
SCZ vs WSML Performance
+13.1%+16.4%
- SCZ 0.40%
- WSML 0.30%, better
- SCZ $12.7B
- WSML $660M
- SCZ +13.1%
- WSML +16.4%, better
- SCZ 3.20%, better
- WSML 2.84%
- SCZ 2039
- WSML 3686
- SCZ 1.3M sh, better
- WSML 16.5K sh
- SCZ $82.65
- WSML $34.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCZ | WSML |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A88 |
| Risk | C49 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | A92Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | A74 |
| Durability | A85Higher | C49 |
Rank among International Small-Cap funds
Same Category. SCZ and WSML are both graded against the same 16 International Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCZA
WSMLA
In short
SCZ The purist's take on foreign small caps: developed markets only, outside the US and Canada. Trading since 2007, SCZ follows the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, so Japan, Europe and Australia are in and emerging markets stay out.
WSML One ticker for small caps across the whole developed world, US included. Most funds on this shelf stop at the water's edge; WSML holds the full map, at 0.30% a year.
Stated mandate
SCZ The fund seeks to track an index of small-cap equities from developed markets outside the United States and Canada, providing international diversification and exposure to overseas small-cap stocks.
WSML The Fund seeks to track an index composed of small-capitalization equities from developed markets globally.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCZ vs WSML Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCZ vs WSML Cost
Overpaying SCZ vs WSML
$1,941
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCZ 0.40%
$8,090
WSML 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCZ | WSML | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $545 | $178 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $2,113 | $680 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $6,149 | $1,941 |
- 0.40%SCZ
- 0.30%WSML, cheaper
- Middle half of International Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.44%
WSML 3rd cheapest of 16 funds
SCZ 6th cheapest of 16 funds
SCZ vs WSML Dividends
- SCZ 3.20%, better
- WSML 2.84%
- SCZ $2.67
- WSML $0.97
- SCZ $1.17
- WSML $0.29
- SCZ Jun 15, 2026
- WSML Jun 15, 2026
- SCZ Jun 18, 2026
- WSML Jun 18, 2026
- SCZ Twice a year
- WSML Twice a year
Distribution history
SCZ vs WSML Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCZ 13.6%WSML 13.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCZ 1.04WSML 1.46
- Worst fall
- SCZ −35.5%WSML −10.7%
- Market sensitivity
- SCZ 1.00WSML 0.89
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.