SCHM ranks 2nd and FNY 12th of 13 funds in the US Mid-Cap Category.
FNY vs SCHM
SCHM −0.70pt a year
0.73%0.03%
SCHM 86.0×the volume
20.7K1.78M
FNY +1.9pt
+13.1%+11.2%
FNY vs SCHM Performance
+30.2%+39.8%
- FNY 0.73%
- SCHM 0.03%, better
- FNY $549M
- SCHM $14.8B
- FNY +5.3%
- SCHM +19.7%, better
- FNY 0.00%
- SCHM 1.27%, better
- FNY 227
- SCHM 502
- FNY 20.7K sh
- SCHM 1.78M sh, better
- FNY $98.11
- SCHM $34.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FNY | SCHM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A86Higher |
| Mission | A79 | A100Higher |
| Risk | F13 | D36Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | A82Higher |
| Holdings | C50 | A87Higher |
| Durability | B55 | A73Higher |
Rank among US Mid-Cap funds
Same Category. FNY and SCHM are both graded against the same 13 US Mid-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FNYD
SCHMA
In short
FNY Most mid-cap funds just own the market. FNY runs Nasdaq's AlphaDEX screen instead: rank mid-cap growth names, cut the weakest, weight by score rather than size. A quant stock-picker in index clothing.
SCHM The forgotten middle of the US market, for three basis points. SCHM has tracked the Dow Jones U.S. Mid-Cap Total Stock Market Index since 2011, holding roughly 500 companies at a fee nobody in the category undercuts.
Stated mandate
FNY The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Mid Cap Growth Index. It uses an indexing approach, normally investing at least 90% of net assets in securities comprising that index.
SCHM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Mid-Cap Total Stock Market Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FNY vs SCHM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FNY vs SCHM Cost
Overpaying FNY vs SCHM
$13,495
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FNY 0.73%
$14,133
SCHM 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FNY | SCHM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,302 | $55 | $1,247 |
| 20 | $4,952 | $216 | $4,736 |
| 30 | $14,133 | $638 | $13,495 |
- 0.73%FNY
- 0.03%SCHM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Mid-Cap funds
- Median 0.15%
SCHM cheapest of 13 funds
FNY 12th cheapest of 13 funds
FNY vs SCHM Dividends
- FNY 0.00%
- SCHM 1.27%, better
- FNY None
- SCHM $0.44
- FNY
- SCHM $0.13
- FNY
- SCHM Sep 23, 2026
- FNY
- SCHM Sep 28, 2026
- FNY
- SCHM Quarterly
Distribution history
FNY vs SCHM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FNY
- SCHM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FNY 18.8%SCHM 15.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FNY 0.86SCHM 0.93, better
- Worst fall
- FNY −33.9%SCHM −26.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FNY 1.20SCHM 1.06
Popular comparisons
- 0.73% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.73% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.73% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.