Skip to content

FPWR vs GASZ

First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF

FPWRCNYSE Arca

Corgi Natural Gas Power & Turbines ETF

GASZCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

GASZ −0.61pt a year

FPWR0.96%GASZ0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

FPWR 3.7×the volume

FPWR7.37KGASZ1.97K

FPWR vs GASZ Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+2.0%FPWR−11.0%GASZ

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. FPWR +2.0%. GASZ −11.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FPWR 0.96%
GASZ 0.35%, better
Fund size
FPWR $36M
GASZ $9M
1Y total return
FPWR +15.0%
GASZ No data
Yield (12M)
FPWR 2.07%
GASZ No data
Holdings
FPWR 62
GASZ 23
Avg volume (30D)
FPWR 7.37K sh, better
GASZ 1.97K sh
NAV per share
FPWR $37.63
GASZ $20.61
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FPWR: Cost 5, Risk 86, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 70, Durability 70. GASZ: Cost 85, Risk 39, Mission not scored, Tradability 24, Holdings 40, Durability 20.
Pillar letters and Scores for FPWR, GASZ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFPWRGASZ
Cost30% weightF5A85Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA86HigherD39
Tradability15% weightB59HigherF24
Holdings10% weightA70HigherC40
Durability5% weightA70HigherF20

Rank among Grid & Electrification funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FPWR and GASZ are both graded against the same 10 Grid & Electrification funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Grid & Electrification⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

GASZ ranks 4th and FPWR 8th of 10 funds in the Grid & Electrification Category.

  1. Rank 1BZAPGlobal X U.S. Electrification ETFScore 67
  2. Rank 2BELFYALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 3BGRIDFirst Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index FundScore 57
  4. Rank 4CGASZCorgi Natural Gas Power & Turbines ETFScore 53
  5. Rank 5CJOULCorgi High Voltage Grid Equipment ETFScore 51
  6. Rank 6CVOLTTema Electrification ETFScore 46
  7. Rank 8CFPWRFirst Trust EIP Power Solutions ETFScore 44
  8. Rank 9CWATSCorgi Battery Energy Storage Systems ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FPWRCFirst Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF

GASZCCorgi Natural Gas Power & Turbines ETF

In short

FPWR The stock-picker in a category of index trackers. First Trust hands the keys to energy-income specialist EIP, which assembles a power portfolio (grid, gas, nuclear, storage) balanced between dividends and capital appreciation.

GASZ No data

Stated mandate

FPWR The Fund seeks competitive risk-adjusted total returns balanced between dividends and capital appreciation.

GASZ No data

Why people hold it

  • FPWR Actively run, not indexed: sub-advisor Energy Income Partners picks the names, aiming for risk-adjusted total return split between dividends and capital appreciation.eipinvestments.com
  • The mandate spans the whole electricity chain: generation, transmission and distribution, grid solutions, storage, nuclear life-extension and small modular reactors, gas and uranium.sec.gov
  • Picks-and-shovels included: engineering, consulting and construction firms qualify when at least 50% of revenue or profit comes from energy and utility work.sec.gov
  • Income is built into the design rather than incidental, and the fund distributes on a quarterly schedule.

GASZ No data

Worth knowing

  • FPWR Active talent costs: 0.96% a year, while index-based rivals ELFY and ZAP charge 0.50% and GRID 0.56%.
  • A small fund that trades lightly, so the bid-ask spread can matter as much as the expense ratio when you enter or exit.
  • It traded as the First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) until September 2025, when the strategy and name changed, so earlier results reflect a different mandate.businesswire.com

GASZ No data

Full FPWR profile⁠

Full GASZ profile⁠

FPWR vs GASZ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FPWR vs GASZ Cost

Overpaying FPWR vs GASZ

$10,908

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FPWR 0.96%

    $18,034

  • GASZ 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FPWR 0.96%
  • GASZ 0.35%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FPWR $18,034GASZ $7,126

Year by year

YearFPWRGASZOverpaying
10$1,695$634$1,061
20$6,383$2,454$3,929
30$18,034$7,126$10,908

Expense ratio

  • 0.96%FPWR
  • 0.35%GASZ, cheaper
  • Middle half of Grid & Electrification funds
  • Median 0.53%

GASZ cheapest of 10 funds

FPWR 10th cheapest of 10 funds

FPWR vs GASZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FPWR 2.07%
GASZ No data
Payout (12M)
FPWR $0.78
GASZ None
Last payment
FPWR $0.22
GASZ No data
Ex-dividend
FPWR Sep 24, 2026
GASZ No data
Paid on
FPWR Sep 30, 2026
GASZ No data
Frequency
FPWR Quarterly
GASZ No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2019 to 2026, same scale for both

FPWRQuarterly · 28 paymentsAll FPWR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 28 payments from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Dec 13, 2019 $0.15; Mar 26, 2020 $0.06; Jun 25, 2020 $0.11; Sep 24, 2020 $0.12; Dec 24, 2020 $0.08; Mar 25, 2021 $0.08; Jun 24, 2021 $0.10; Sep 23, 2021 $0.10; Dec 23, 2021 $0.13; Mar 25, 2022 $0.08; Jun 24, 2022 $0.09; Sep 23, 2022 $0.09; Dec 23, 2022 $0.22; Mar 24, 2023 $0.11; Jun 27, 2023 $0.15; Sep 22, 2023 $0.17; Dec 22, 2023 $0.18; Mar 21, 2024 $0.11; Jun 27, 2024 $0.22; Sep 26, 2024 $0.23; Dec 13, 2024 $0.18; Mar 27, 2025 $0.16; Jun 26, 2025 $0.14; Sep 25, 2025 $0.15; Dec 12, 2025 $0.19; Mar 26, 2026 $0.19; Jun 25, 2026 $0.18; Sep 24, 2026 $0.22. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD
GASZAll GASZ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FPWR vs GASZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FPWR 13.4%GASZ No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FPWR 1.19GASZ No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FPWR −19.8%GASZ No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FPWR 0.56GASZ −2.04

Popular comparisons

  • FPWRCvsZAPB

    First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF · Global X U.S. Electrification ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.96% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GASZCvsZAPB

    Corgi Natural Gas Power & Turbines ETF · Global X U.S. Electrification ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FPWRCvsELFYB

    First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF · ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.96% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GASZCvsELFYB

    Corgi Natural Gas Power & Turbines ETF · ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FPWRCvsGRIDB

    First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF · First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.96% · 0.56%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GASZCvsGRIDB

    Corgi Natural Gas Power & Turbines ETF · First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.56%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.