Skip to content

FSEP vs XTR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September

FSEPCCboe

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

XTR −0.60pt a year

FSEP0.85%XTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

FSEP 30.4×the volume

FSEP49.9KXTR1.64K

5Y return · a year

FSEP +1.0pt

FSEP+9.8%XTR+8.8%

FSEP vs XTR Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+59.8%FSEP+52.2%XTR

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. FSEP +59.8%. XTR +52.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FSEP 0.85%
XTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
FSEP $1.43B
XTR $5M
1Y total return
FSEP +11.1%, better
XTR +7.5%
Yield (12M)
FSEP No data
XTR 16.51%
Holdings
FSEP 3
XTR 505
Avg volume (30D)
FSEP 49.9K sh, better
XTR 1.64K sh
NAV per share
FSEP $56.90
XTR $28.54
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FSEP: Cost 11, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 89, Holdings 54, Durability 83. XTR: Cost 100, Risk 18, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 85, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for FSEP, XTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFSEPXTR
Cost30% weightF11A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC52HigherF18
Tradability15% weightA89HigherF13
Holdings10% weightC54A85Higher
Durability5% weightA83HigherC46

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FSEP and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

FSEP ranks 48th and XTR 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 48CFJULFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - JulyScore 45
  2. Rank 48CFSEPFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 45
  3. Rank 48CXBFRInnovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETFScore 45
  4. Rank 57CXIDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - DecemberScore 40
  5. Rank 57CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FSEPCFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

In short

FSEP The September rung of First Trust's twelve-month buffer ladder. It follows the price return of State Street's S&P 500 ETF, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and trades away upside above a cap that resets every September.

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

Stated mandate

FSEP The fund seeks to track the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to a 14.00% upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses during the stated outcome period.

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • FSEP The cushion is written into the mandate, not left to a manager's judgment: across each one-year period the options package absorbs the first 10% of a decline in the reference S&P 500 ETF, before fees.
  • Twelve sibling funds, one per calendar month, all at the same 0.85% fee. Pick a start month or stack several so your protection isn't tied to a single September date.
  • Running since 2020 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund with moderate trading activity, so the September vintage is a well-used rung rather than a thin experiment.
  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • FSEP At 0.85% a year it prices above the typical buffer fund, and cheaper paths to a 10% buffer exist (BUFB at 0.10%, ZALT at 0.69%).
  • Built to be held from one September reset to the next. Buy mid-period and your effective cap and leftover cushion differ from the stated terms.
  • No distributions, so the payoff arrives in the share price. And the cushion stops at 10%; declines past that land on you alongside the reference ETF.
  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.

Full FSEP profile⁠

Full XTR profile⁠

FSEP vs XTR Holdings

How FSEP and XTR differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of FSEP and 0.0% of XTR.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors97.7%

Sector

Sector weights in FSEP and XTR, widest gap first
SectorMore in FSEPMore in XTR
TechnologyXTR +2.0 points
FinancialsFSEP +0.9 points
Consumer DiscretionaryFSEP +0.6 points
CommunicationXTR +0.4 points
IndustrialsFSEP +0.3 points
Real EstateFSEP +0.1 points
UtilitiesFSEP +0.1 points
MaterialsFSEP +0.1 points
Consumer StaplesFSEP +0.2 points
Health CareFSEP +0.1 points
EnergySame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for FSEP.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FSEP104.0%
  • XTR37.0%

Securities held

  • FSEP2
  • XTR504

Asset class

FSEP
Multi-Asset
XTR
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FSEP2
  • In both0
  • Only in XTR504

Only in FSEP

2 securities, 100% of FSEP by weight

  • 2027-09-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 7.6297.56%
  • 2027-09-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 761.695.39%

Only in XTR

504 securities, 99.8% of XTR by weight

  • Apple Inc7.66%
  • NVIDIA Corp7.54%
  • Microsoft Corp5.89%

Weight gaps

FSEP and XTR share no securities.

All 4 FSEP holdings⁠All 503 XTR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FSEP vs XTR Cost

Overpaying FSEP vs XTR

$11,040

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FSEP 0.85%

    $16,199

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FSEP 0.85%
  • XTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FSEP $16,199XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearFSEPXTROverpaying
10$1,508$455$1,053
20$5,706$1,769$3,937
30$16,199$5,159$11,040

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%FSEP
  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

FSEP 60th cheapest of 77 funds

FSEP vs XTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
FSEP No data
XTR 16.51%
Payout (12M)
FSEP None
XTR $4.69
Last payment
FSEP No data
XTR $0.08
Ex-dividend
FSEP No data
XTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
FSEP No data
XTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
FSEP No data
XTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

FSEPAll FSEP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

FSEP vs XTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FSEP
  • XTR
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: XTR −20.8% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FSEP 7.5%, betterXTR 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FSEP 1.43, betterXTR 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FSEP −13.8%, betterXTR −20.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FSEP 0.62XTR 0.94

FSEP and XTR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FSEPCvsZALTA

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsZALTA

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FSEPCvsAUGPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FSEPCvsTENJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsTENJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.