ILCV ranks 2nd and FSMD 16th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FSMD vs ILCV
ILCV −0.11pt a year
0.15%0.04%
FSMD 6.3×the volume
154K24.4K
ILCV +3.5pt
+9.1%+12.6%
FSMD vs ILCV Performance
+54.3%+81.1%
- FSMD 0.15%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- FSMD $2.49B
- ILCV $1.37B
- FSMD +18.1%
- ILCV +21.0%, better
- FSMD 1.29%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- FSMD 600
- ILCV 375
- FSMD 154K sh, better
- ILCV 24.4K sh
- FSMD $50.22
- ILCV $109.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FSMD | ILCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A95Higher | A82 |
| Risk | D39 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | C52 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | A86Higher | D39 |
| Durability | B63 | A82Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FSMD and ILCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FSMDA
ILCVA
In short
FSMD Most multifactor ETFs run their screens on the biggest US companies. FSMD points the same four lenses (cheap, high-quality, trending, calmer) at small and mid-cap America, and charges 0.15% a year to do it.
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
Stated mandate
FSMD Seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index by normally investing at least 80% in its securities. The index covers small- and mid-capitalization U.S. companies selected for attractive valuations, high quality, positive momentum, and lower volatility than the broader market.
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FSMD vs ILCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FSMD vs ILCV Cost
Overpaying FSMD vs ILCV
$2,288
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FSMD 0.15%
$3,137
ILCV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FSMD | ILCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $73 | $201 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $288 | $783 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $849 | $2,288 |
- 0.15%FSMD
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
FSMD 13th cheapest of 99 funds
FSMD vs ILCV Dividends
- FSMD 1.29%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- FSMD $0.65
- ILCV $1.65
- FSMD $0.19
- ILCV $0.42
- FSMD Sep 18, 2026
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- FSMD Sep 22, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- FSMD Quarterly
- ILCV Quarterly
Distribution history
FSMD vs ILCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FSMD
- ILCV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FSMD 15.4%ILCV 10.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FSMD 0.94ILCV 1.57, better
- Worst fall
- FSMD −22.2%ILCV −18.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FSMD 0.95ILCV 0.82
FSMD and ILCV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

