VONV ranks 1st and FSMD 16th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FSMD vs VONV
VONV −0.09pt a year
0.15%0.06%
VONV 5.0×the volume
154K774K
VONV +2.6pt
+9.1%+11.7%
FSMD vs VONV Performance
+54.3%+73.8%
- FSMD 0.15%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- FSMD $2.49B
- VONV $23.3B
- FSMD +18.1%
- VONV +28.5%, better
- FSMD 1.29%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- FSMD 600
- VONV 873
- FSMD 154K sh
- VONV 774K sh, better
- FSMD $50.22
- VONV $113.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FSMD | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A95 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D39 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | C52 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | A86Higher | C49 |
| Durability | B63 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FSMD and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FSMDA
VONVA
In short
FSMD Most multifactor ETFs run their screens on the biggest US companies. FSMD points the same four lenses (cheap, high-quality, trending, calmer) at small and mid-cap America, and charges 0.15% a year to do it.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
FSMD Seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index by normally investing at least 80% in its securities. The index covers small- and mid-capitalization U.S. companies selected for attractive valuations, high quality, positive momentum, and lower volatility than the broader market.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FSMD vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FSMD vs VONV Cost
Overpaying FSMD vs VONV
$1,867
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FSMD 0.15%
$3,137
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FSMD | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $110 | $164 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $432 | $639 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $1,270 | $1,867 |
- 0.15%FSMD
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
FSMD 13th cheapest of 99 funds
FSMD vs VONV Dividends
- FSMD 1.29%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- FSMD $0.65
- VONV $1.74
- FSMD $0.19
- VONV $0.42
- FSMD Sep 18, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- FSMD Sep 22, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- FSMD Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
FSMD vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FSMD
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FSMD 15.4%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FSMD 0.94VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- FSMD −22.2%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FSMD 0.95VONV 0.85
FSMD and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


