VYM ranks 2nd and FSMD 16th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FSMD vs VYM
VYM −0.11pt a year
0.15%0.04%
VYM 7.4×the volume
154K1.14M
VYM +2.7pt
+9.1%+11.8%
FSMD vs VYM Performance
+54.3%+74.3%
- FSMD 0.15%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- FSMD $2.49B
- VYM $95.8B
- FSMD +18.1%
- VYM +19.3%, better
- FSMD 1.29%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- FSMD 600
- VYM 601
- FSMD 154K sh
- VYM 1.14M sh, better
- FSMD $50.22
- VYM $163.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FSMD | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A95Higher | A79 |
| Risk | D39 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | C52 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | A86Higher | C53 |
| Durability | B63 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FSMD and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FSMDA
VYMA
In short
FSMD Most multifactor ETFs run their screens on the biggest US companies. FSMD points the same four lenses (cheap, high-quality, trending, calmer) at small and mid-cap America, and charges 0.15% a year to do it.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
FSMD Seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index by normally investing at least 80% in its securities. The index covers small- and mid-capitalization U.S. companies selected for attractive valuations, high quality, positive momentum, and lower volatility than the broader market.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FSMD vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FSMD vs VYM Cost
Overpaying FSMD vs VYM
$2,288
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FSMD 0.15%
$3,137
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FSMD | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $73 | $201 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $288 | $783 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $849 | $2,288 |
- 0.15%FSMD
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
FSMD 13th cheapest of 99 funds
FSMD vs VYM Dividends
- FSMD 1.29%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- FSMD $0.65
- VYM $3.68
- FSMD $0.19
- VYM $0.89
- FSMD Sep 18, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- FSMD Sep 22, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- FSMD Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
FSMD vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FSMD
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FSMD 15.4%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FSMD 0.94VYM 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- FSMD −22.2%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FSMD 0.95VYM 0.75
FSMD and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




