IUSV ranks 3rd and FTA 26th of 40 funds in the US Value Index Category.
FTA vs IUSV
IUSV −0.54pt a year
0.58%0.04%
IUSV 15.7×the volume
36.7K575K
IUSV +0.8pt
+11.5%+12.3%
FTA vs IUSV Performance
+71.4%+72.6%
- FTA 0.58%
- IUSV 0.04%, better
- FTA $1.46B
- IUSV $28.5B
- FTA +28.1%, better
- IUSV +16.6%
- FTA 1.68%, better
- IUSV 1.63%
- FTA 188
- IUSV 734
- FTA 36.7K sh
- IUSV 575K sh, better
- FTA $103.97
- IUSV $115.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTA | IUSV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A82 | A88Higher |
| Risk | B64 | B64 |
| Tradability | B60 | A82Higher |
| Holdings | B67Higher | C48 |
| Durability | B62 | A79Higher |
Rank among US Value Index funds
Same Category. FTA and IUSV are both graded against the same 40 US Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTAC
IUSVA
In short
FTA FTA doesn't just buy the value index and call it a day. It screens US large caps on value and profitability, then holds only the names that clear the bar, a 2007-vintage rules-based stock picker in an ETF wrapper.
IUSV A value fund with a wider net: it tracks the S&P 900 Value Index, which screens S&P 500 and MidCap 400 stocks on book value, earnings and sales versus price. Roughly 700 names, 0.04% a year, running since 2000.
Stated mandate
FTA The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index.
IUSV The fund seeks to track the S&P 900 Value Index, which represents large- and mid-capitalization U.S. value equities. Value characteristics are identified using book value, earnings, and sales relative to price.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTA vs IUSV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTA vs IUSV Cost
Overpaying FTA vs IUSV
$10,604
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTA 0.58%
$11,453
IUSV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTA | IUSV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,041 | $73 | $968 |
| 20 | $3,986 | $288 | $3,698 |
| 30 | $11,453 | $849 | $10,604 |
- 0.58%FTA
- 0.04%IUSV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Value Index funds
- Median 0.20%
IUSV 3rd cheapest of 40 funds
FTA 36th cheapest of 40 funds
FTA vs IUSV Dividends
- FTA 1.68%, better
- IUSV 1.63%
- FTA $1.75
- IUSV $1.89
- FTA $0.53
- IUSV $0.49
- FTA Sep 24, 2026
- IUSV Sep 15, 2026
- FTA Sep 30, 2026
- IUSV Sep 18, 2026
- FTA Quarterly
- IUSV Quarterly
Distribution history
FTA vs IUSV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FTA
- IUSV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTA 13.5%IUSV 11.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FTA 1.14IUSV 1.15, better
- Worst fall
- FTA −19.8%IUSV −17.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FTA 0.64IUSV 0.85
FTA and IUSV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.58% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
