IWD ranks 4th and FTA 26th of 40 funds in the US Value Index Category.
FTA vs IWD
IWD −0.40pt a year
0.58%0.18%
IWD 54.7×the volume
36.7K2.01M
IWD +0.4pt
+11.5%+11.9%
FTA vs IWD Performance
+71.4%+72.9%
- FTA 0.58%
- IWD 0.18%, better
- FTA $1.46B
- IWD $83.2B
- FTA +28.1%
- IWD +28.4%, better
- FTA 1.68%, better
- IWD 1.37%
- FTA 188
- IWD 874
- FTA 36.7K sh
- IWD 2.01M sh, better
- FTA $103.97
- IWD $258.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTA | IWD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | B59Higher |
| Mission | A82 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B64 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | B60 | A96Higher |
| Holdings | B67Higher | C42 |
| Durability | B62 | A82Higher |
Rank among US Value Index funds
Same Category. FTA and IWD are both graded against the same 40 US Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTAC
IWDA
In short
FTA FTA doesn't just buy the value index and call it a day. It screens US large caps on value and profitability, then holds only the names that clear the bar, a 2007-vintage rules-based stock picker in an ETF wrapper.
IWD The original Russell 1000 Value tracker, live since 2000 and still one of the most traded ways to own the value half of US large caps. Roughly 900 stocks, followed closely, at a price that reflects the plumbing.
Stated mandate
FTA The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index.
IWD The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks that may be undervalued relative to comparable companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTA vs IWD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTA vs IWD Cost
Overpaying FTA vs IWD
$7,704
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTA 0.58%
$11,453
IWD 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTA | IWD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,041 | $328 | $713 |
| 20 | $3,986 | $1,281 | $2,705 |
| 30 | $11,453 | $3,749 | $7,704 |
- 0.58%FTA
- 0.18%IWD, cheaper
- Middle half of US Value Index funds
- Median 0.20%
IWD 16th cheapest of 40 funds
FTA 36th cheapest of 40 funds
FTA vs IWD Dividends
- FTA 1.68%, better
- IWD 1.37%
- FTA $1.75
- IWD $3.53
- FTA $0.53
- IWD $0.93
- FTA Sep 24, 2026
- IWD Sep 15, 2026
- FTA Sep 30, 2026
- IWD Sep 18, 2026
- FTA Quarterly
- IWD Quarterly
Distribution history
FTA vs IWD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FTA
- IWD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTA 13.5%IWD 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FTA 1.14IWD 1.42, better
- Worst fall
- FTA −19.8%IWD −19.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FTA 0.64IWD 0.85
FTA and IWD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.58% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





