Skip to content

FTC vs VONV

First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund

FTCCNasdaq

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

VONVANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

VONV −0.52pt a year

FTC0.58%VONV0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

VONV 50.8×the volume

FTC15.3KVONV776K

10Y return · a year

FTC +1.8pt

FTC+13.7%VONV+11.9%

FTC vs VONV Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+40.1%FTC+73.9%VONV

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. FTC +40.1%. VONV +73.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%60%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FTC 0.58%
VONV 0.06%, better
Fund size
FTC $1.22B
VONV $21.7B
1Y total return
FTC +5.4%
VONV +30.6%, better
Yield (12M)
FTC 0.12%
VONV 1.51%, better
Holdings
FTC 188
VONV 887
Avg volume (30D)
FTC 15.3K sh
VONV 776K sh, better
NAV per share
FTC $161.98
VONV $112.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FTC: Cost 19, Risk 18, Mission 62, Tradability 64, Holdings 72, Durability 76. VONV: Cost 96, Risk 89, Mission 100, Tradability 59, Holdings 49, Durability 92.
Pillar letters and Scores for FTC, VONV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFTCVONV
Cost30% weightF19A96Higher
Mission25% weightB62A100Higher
Risk15% weightF18A89Higher
Tradability15% weightB64HigherB59
Holdings10% weightA72HigherC49
Durability5% weightA76A92Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FTC and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

VONV ranks 1st and FTC 75th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 73CCAFGPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETFScore 45
  4. Rank 75CFTCFirst Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX FundScore 44
  5. Rank 75CLSAFLeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETFScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FTCCFirst Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund

VONVAVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

In short

FTC A 2007-vintage smart-beta original. Instead of ranking large-cap growth names by size, FTC scores the field on growth and value metrics and holds only the roughly 190 stocks its AlphaDEX screen likes best.

VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.

Stated mandate

FTC The fund seeks investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Large Cap Growth Index, before fees and expenses.

VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.

Why people hold it

  • FTC Rules-based, not cap-weighted: the AlphaDEX screen ranks large caps on both growth and value measures, so position sizes come from the scoring model rather than from a company's market value.ftportfolios.com
  • Launched in 2007, making it one of the elder statesmen of factor investing, with a live record across multiple full market cycles rather than a backtest.
  • Roughly 190 holdings, a far wider net than the concentrated megacap-heavy growth funds it sits beside. It is a multi-billion-dollar fund and pays quarterly.
  • VONV 0.06% a year, a fraction of the typical fee among factor ETFs. On a rules-based value index there is little room for cleverness, so cost does most of the work.vanguard.com
  • Full replication, not sampling: it owns the index's roughly 900 names and has stayed tightly aligned with the Russell 1000 Value benchmark since launching in 2010.
  • Same Russell benchmark as pricier rivals for less: the Goldman MarketBeta version (GVUS) charges 0.12% to track the identical value index.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, among the easiest in its group to get in and out of, and it distributes quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • FTC At 0.58%, the fee runs well above the multifactor peer median of 0.32%, and above rules-based rivals like FNDX (0.25%) and IUSG (0.04%). The screen has to earn that gap.
  • Thinly traded compared with its category, so spreads can widen. Limit orders and avoiding the opening and closing bells matter more here than with the mega-liquid names.
  • The blended growth-and-value screen means the portfolio can look and behave quite differently from a plain large-cap growth benchmark in any given stretch.
  • VONV One screen, one style. Value only, with no quality or momentum overlay, so the ride follows the value side of the market wherever it goes.vanguard.com
  • This is the entire value bucket, not a best-ideas portfolio. About 900 holdings means results hug the large-cap value category rather than stray from it.
  • Cheaper exists nearby: Vanguard's VYM charges 0.04%, but it screens for dividend yield, a different portfolio than a Russell value index.

Full FTC profile⁠

Full VONV profile⁠

FTC vs VONV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FTC vs VONV Cost

Overpaying FTC vs VONV

$10,183

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FTC 0.58%

    $11,453

  • VONV 0.06%

    $1,270

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FTC 0.58%
  • VONV 0.06%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530FTC $11,453VONV $1,270

Year by year

YearFTCVONVOverpaying
10$1,041$110$931
20$3,986$432$3,554
30$11,453$1,270$10,183

Expense ratio

  • 0.58%FTC
  • 0.06%VONV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds

FTC 79th cheapest of 99 funds

FTC vs VONV Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
FTC 0.12%
VONV 1.51%, better
Payout (12M)
FTC $0.20
VONV $1.74
Last payment
FTC $0.07
VONV $0.42
Ex-dividend
FTC Sep 24, 2026
VONV Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
FTC Sep 30, 2026
VONV Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
FTC Quarterly
VONV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FTCQuarterly · 34 paymentsAll FTC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 34 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 23, 2017 $0.04; Jun 22, 2017 $0.07; Sep 21, 2017 $0.07; Dec 21, 2017 $0.07; Mar 22, 2018 $0.03; Jun 21, 2018 $0.06; Sep 14, 2018 $0.04; Dec 18, 2018 $0.07; Mar 21, 2019 $0.16; Jun 14, 2019 $0.05; Sep 25, 2019 $0.15; Dec 13, 2019 $0.11; Mar 26, 2020 $0.27; Jun 25, 2020 $0.08; Sep 24, 2020 $0.04; Mar 25, 2022 $0.09; Jun 24, 2022 $0.13; Sep 23, 2022 $0.28; Dec 23, 2022 $0.33; Mar 24, 2023 $0.25; Jun 27, 2023 $0.13; Sep 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 22, 2023 $0.21; Mar 21, 2024 $0.02; Jun 27, 2024 $0.05; Sep 26, 2024 $0.10; Dec 13, 2024 $0.28; Mar 27, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.11; Sep 25, 2025 $0.13; Dec 12, 2025 $0.03; Mar 26, 2026 $0.06; Jun 25, 2026 $0.04; Sep 24, 2026 $0.07. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
VONVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VONV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.21; Jun 28, 2017 $0.29; Sep 27, 2017 $0.34; Dec 14, 2017 $0.34; Mar 22, 2018 $0.24; Jun 28, 2018 $0.32; Sep 26, 2018 $0.33; Dec 13, 2018 $0.35; Mar 25, 2019 $0.29; Jun 21, 2019 $0.32; Sep 26, 2019 $0.38; Dec 16, 2019 $0.39; Mar 26, 2020 $0.36; Jun 25, 2020 $0.32; Sep 11, 2020 $0.28; Dec 17, 2020 $0.39; Mar 26, 2021 $0.26; Jun 29, 2021 $0.27; Sep 29, 2021 $0.33; Dec 16, 2021 $0.37; Mar 24, 2022 $0.30; Jun 29, 2022 $0.37; Sep 28, 2022 $0.38; Dec 15, 2022 $0.42; Mar 23, 2023 $0.32; Jun 23, 2023 $0.35; Sep 21, 2023 $0.39; Dec 19, 2023 $0.46; Mar 21, 2024 $0.33; Jun 27, 2024 $0.39; Sep 26, 2024 $0.44; Dec 23, 2024 $0.44; Mar 25, 2025 $0.38; Jun 20, 2025 $0.40; Sep 24, 2025 $0.40; Dec 22, 2025 $0.49; Mar 24, 2026 $0.41; Jun 18, 2026 $0.41; Sep 23, 2026 $0.42. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

FTC vs VONV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FTC
  • VONV
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: FTC −31.2% · Jun 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FTC 17.6%VONV 12.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FTC 0.99VONV 1.43, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FTC −31.2%VONV −18.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FTC 1.14VONV 0.85

FTC and VONV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FTCCvsILCVA

    First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsILCVA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTCCvsVYMA

    First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsVYMA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTCCvsDCORA

    First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund · U.S. Core Equity 1 Portfolio ETF Class Shares

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsDCORA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · U.S. Core Equity 1 Portfolio ETF Class Shares

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.