VYM ranks 2nd and FTCS 53rd of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FTCS vs VYM
VYM −0.49pt a year
0.53%0.04%
VYM 2.8×the volume
412K1.14M
VYM +0.5pt
+11.5%+12.0%
FTCS vs VYM Performance
+36.5%+74.3%
- FTCS 0.53%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- FTCS $7.94B
- VYM $95.8B
- FTCS +13.4%
- VYM +19.3%, better
- FTCS 1.12%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- FTCS 51
- VYM 601
- FTCS 412K sh
- VYM 1.14M sh, better
- FTCS $102.28
- VYM $163.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTCS | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | B64 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | A96Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | C47 | C53Higher |
| Durability | A81 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FTCS and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTCSC
VYMA
In short
FTCS A 2006-vintage take on quality investing: the Capital Strength Index screens US companies for profitability and calm price action, then keeps about 50. Concentrated by design, and priced accordingly.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
FTCS FTCS seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of The Capital StrengthTM Index. The fund states that achieving its investment objective is not guaranteed.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTCS vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTCS vs VYM Cost
Overpaying FTCS vs VYM
$9,687
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTCS 0.53%
$10,536
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTCS | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $953 | $73 | $880 |
| 20 | $3,658 | $288 | $3,370 |
| 30 | $10,536 | $849 | $9,687 |
- 0.53%FTCS
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
FTCS 76th cheapest of 99 funds
FTCS vs VYM Dividends
- FTCS 1.12%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- FTCS $1.14
- VYM $3.68
- FTCS $0.33
- VYM $0.89
- FTCS Sep 24, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- FTCS Sep 30, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- FTCS Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
FTCS vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FTCS
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTCS 12.1%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FTCS 0.74VYM 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- FTCS −20.9%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FTCS 0.53VYM 0.75
FTCS and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.53% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




