VONV ranks 1st and FTCS 53rd of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FTCS vs VONV
VONV −0.47pt a year
0.53%0.06%
VONV 1.9×the volume
412K774K
VONV +0.5pt
+11.5%+12.0%
FTCS vs VONV Performance
+36.5%+73.8%
- FTCS 0.53%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- FTCS $7.94B
- VONV $23.3B
- FTCS +13.4%
- VONV +28.5%, better
- FTCS 1.12%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- FTCS 51
- VONV 873
- FTCS 412K sh
- VONV 774K sh, better
- FTCS $102.28
- VONV $113.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTCS | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B64 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | A96Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | C47 | C49Higher |
| Durability | A81 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FTCS and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTCSC
VONVA
In short
FTCS A 2006-vintage take on quality investing: the Capital Strength Index screens US companies for profitability and calm price action, then keeps about 50. Concentrated by design, and priced accordingly.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
FTCS FTCS seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of The Capital StrengthTM Index. The fund states that achieving its investment objective is not guaranteed.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTCS vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTCS vs VONV Cost
Overpaying FTCS vs VONV
$9,266
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTCS 0.53%
$10,536
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTCS | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $953 | $110 | $843 |
| 20 | $3,658 | $432 | $3,226 |
| 30 | $10,536 | $1,270 | $9,266 |
- 0.53%FTCS
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
FTCS 76th cheapest of 99 funds
FTCS vs VONV Dividends
- FTCS 1.12%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- FTCS $1.14
- VONV $1.74
- FTCS $0.33
- VONV $0.42
- FTCS Sep 24, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- FTCS Sep 30, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- FTCS Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
FTCS vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FTCS
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTCS 12.1%VONV 12.1%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- FTCS 0.74VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- FTCS −20.9%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FTCS 0.53VONV 0.85
FTCS and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.53% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


