Skip to content

FTEC vs XSW

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

FTECANYSE Arca

State Street SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF

XSWBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FTEC −0.27pt a year

FTEC0.08%XSW0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

FTEC 5.0×the volume

FTEC275KXSW54.7K

10Y return · a year

FTEC +8.8pt

FTEC+23.7%XSW+14.9%

FTEC vs XSW Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+124.8%FTEC+16.2%XSW

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FTEC +124.8%. XSW +16.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%50%100%150%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FTEC 0.08%, better
XSW 0.35%
Fund size
FTEC $22.2B
XSW $536M
1Y total return
FTEC +18.5%, better
XSW +5.6%
Yield (12M)
FTEC 0.40%, better
XSW 0.00%
Holdings
FTEC 291
XSW 131
Avg volume (30D)
FTEC 275K sh, better
XSW 54.7K sh
NAV per share
FTEC $279.07
XSW $212.78
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FTEC: Cost 98, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 88, Holdings 38, Durability 73. XSW: Cost 77, Risk 21, Mission 60, Tradability 45, Holdings 91, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for FTEC, XSW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFTECXSW
Cost30% weightA98HigherA77
Mission25% weightNot scoredB60
Risk15% weightB60HigherF21
Tradability15% weightA88HigherC45
Holdings10% weightD38A91Higher
Durability5% weightA73HigherB66

Rank among Technology (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FTEC and XSW are both graded against the same 23 Technology (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Technology (Broad)⁠

Category · 23 funds
See all 23 ›

FTEC ranks 2nd and XSW 9th of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLKState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2AFTECFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 3AVGTVanguard Information Technology ETFScore 71
  4. Rank 8BPSCTInvesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 9BXSWState Street SPDR S&P Software & Services ETFScore 60
  6. Rank 10BTDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index FundScore 59

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FTECAFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

XSWBState Street SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF

In short

FTEC Fidelity's tech sleeve runs 0.08% a year and holds about 300 names, tracking an MSCI index that reaches from mega-cap chipmakers down into small-cap software. Cheap beta on the whole US tech stack, not just the giants.

XSW Most tech funds are really a bet on a handful of megacaps. XSW carves out software and services and weights roughly 130 names close to equally, so a small SaaS shop sits near the giants. Running that way since 2011.

Stated mandate

FTEC Seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology Index.

XSW The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index before fees and expenses. Its mandate covers software and services companies across application software, interactive home entertainment, IT consulting and other services, and systems software.

Why people hold it

  • FTEC At 0.08%, it ties the cheapest fund in its broad-tech group and undercuts VGT's 0.09%, against a cohort median of 0.40%. On a sector sleeve, that gap compounds quietly.
  • The MSCI USA IMI benchmark covers large, mid and small cap US tech, so the roughly 300 holdings stretch past the mega-cap tier alone.msci.com
  • Trading since 2013 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it sits in the top quartile of its broad technology peer group.
  • XSW Modified equal weighting resets constituents toward the same size each quarter, so results lean on software broadly rather than on three or four dominant names.ssga.comspglobal.com
  • A 0.35% expense ratio, below the median for its broad tech peer group, for a strategy that reweights four times a year rather than just riding market cap.spglobal.com
  • Roughly 130 holdings across application software, interactive home entertainment, IT consulting and systems software. One stumble is a small slice, not the whole fund.ssga.com
  • Live since 2011, one of the longest-running equal-weight takes on US software, and it has tracked its index closely across that history.ssga.com

Worth knowing

  • FTEC Membership follows GICS Information Technology, so several household-name tech businesses classified into other sectors never show up here.msci.com
  • One sector, one story: tech moves harder than the broad market in both directions, and roughly 300 names does not soften that.
  • Distributions arrive quarterly, and a growth-heavy sector index is not built around payouts.
  • XSW Equal weighting pulls in small and mid-cap software, the jumpiest corner of tech. The ride here tends to be bumpier than a megacap-led sector fund.ssga.com
  • Cap-weighted rivals cost far less: XLK and FTEC at 0.08%, VGT at 0.09%. The extra fee buys the equal-weight method, not wider coverage.
  • Software companies rarely pay dividends and the fund has not made distributions lately, so price change does essentially all the work. It also trades in moderate volume.

Full FTEC profile⁠

Full XSW profile⁠

FTEC vs XSW Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FTEC vs XSW Cost

Overpaying XSW vs FTEC

$5,353

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FTEC 0.084%

    $1,773

  • XSW 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FTEC 0.084%
  • XSW 0.35%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530XSW $7,126FTEC $1,773

Year by year

YearFTECXSWOverpaying
10$154$634$480
20$603$2,454$1,851
30$1,773$7,126$5,353

Expense ratio

  • 0.08%FTEC, cheaper
  • 0.35%XSW
  • Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.45%

FTEC 2nd cheapest of 23 funds

XSW 5th cheapest of 23 funds

FTEC vs XSW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FTEC 0.40%, better
XSW 0.00%
Payout (12M)
FTEC $1.11
XSW None
Last payment
FTEC $0.33
XSW No data
Ex-dividend
FTEC Sep 18, 2026
XSW No data
Paid on
FTEC Sep 22, 2026
XSW No data
Frequency
FTEC Quarterly
XSW No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FTECQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll FTEC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.10; Jun 16, 2017 $0.12; Sep 15, 2017 $0.12; Dec 15, 2017 $0.13; Mar 16, 2018 $0.12; Jun 15, 2018 $0.14; Sep 21, 2018 $0.14; Dec 21, 2018 $0.19; Mar 15, 2019 $0.18; Jun 21, 2019 $0.19; Sep 20, 2019 $0.19; Dec 20, 2019 $0.19; Mar 20, 2020 $0.28; Jun 19, 2020 $0.20; Sep 18, 2020 $0.19; Dec 18, 2020 $0.20; Mar 19, 2021 $0.20; Jun 18, 2021 $0.20; Sep 17, 2021 $0.20; Dec 17, 2021 $0.26; Mar 18, 2022 $0.21; Jun 17, 2022 $0.22; Sep 16, 2022 $0.22; Dec 16, 2022 $0.23; Mar 17, 2023 $0.23; Jun 16, 2023 $0.22; Sep 15, 2023 $0.22; Dec 15, 2023 $0.43; Mar 15, 2024 $0.24; Jun 21, 2024 $0.23; Sep 20, 2024 $0.23; Dec 20, 2024 $0.21; Mar 21, 2025 $0.23; Jun 20, 2025 $0.23; Sep 19, 2025 $0.23; Dec 19, 2025 $0.27; Mar 20, 2026 $0.22; Jun 18, 2026 $0.29; Sep 18, 2026 $0.33. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
XSW29 paymentsAll XSW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 29 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.03; Jun 16, 2017 $0.04; Sep 15, 2017 $0.03; Dec 15, 2017 $0.22; Mar 19, 2018 $0.02; Jun 18, 2018 $0.04; Sep 24, 2018 $0.04; Dec 24, 2018 $0.13; Mar 18, 2019 $0.03; Jun 24, 2019 $0.03; Sep 23, 2019 $0.02; Dec 23, 2019 $0.04; Mar 23, 2020 $0.32; Jun 22, 2020 $0.02; Sep 21, 2020 $0.001; Dec 21, 2020 $0.05; Sep 20, 2021 $0.15; Dec 20, 2021 $0.06; Mar 21, 2022 $0.0036; Jun 21, 2022 $0.0031; Sep 19, 2022 $0.02; Dec 19, 2022 $0.07; Mar 20, 2023 $0.07; Jun 20, 2023 $0.10; Sep 18, 2023 $0.10; Dec 18, 2023 $0.04; Jun 24, 2024 $0.14; Mar 24, 2025 $0.05; Jun 23, 2025 $0.07. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

FTEC vs XSW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FTEC
  • XSW
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XSW −45.4% · Nov 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FTEC 22.3%, betterXSW 25.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FTEC 1.19, betterXSW 0.68
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FTEC −35.0%, betterXSW −45.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FTEC 1.35XSW 1.37

FTEC and XSW in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FTECAvsXLKA

    Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF · State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XSWBvsXLKA

    State Street SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF · State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTECAvsVGTA

    Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF · Vanguard Information Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XSWBvsVGTA

    State Street SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF · Vanguard Information Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTECAvsRSPTB

    Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XSWBvsRSPTB

    State Street SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.