FTEC ranks 2nd and XSW 9th of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.
FTEC vs XSW
FTEC −0.27pt a year
0.08%0.35%
FTEC 5.0×the volume
275K54.7K
FTEC +8.8pt
+23.7%+14.9%
FTEC vs XSW Performance
+124.8%+16.2%
- FTEC 0.08%, better
- XSW 0.35%
- FTEC $22.2B
- XSW $536M
- FTEC +18.5%, better
- XSW +5.6%
- FTEC 0.40%, better
- XSW 0.00%
- FTEC 291
- XSW 131
- FTEC 275K sh, better
- XSW 54.7K sh
- FTEC $279.07
- XSW $212.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTEC | XSW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | A77 |
| Mission | B60 | |
| Risk | B60Higher | F21 |
| Tradability | A88Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | D38 | A91Higher |
| Durability | A73Higher | B66 |
Rank among Technology (Broad) funds
Same Category. FTEC and XSW are both graded against the same 23 Technology (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTECA
XSWB
In short
FTEC Fidelity's tech sleeve runs 0.08% a year and holds about 300 names, tracking an MSCI index that reaches from mega-cap chipmakers down into small-cap software. Cheap beta on the whole US tech stack, not just the giants.
XSW Most tech funds are really a bet on a handful of megacaps. XSW carves out software and services and weights roughly 130 names close to equally, so a small SaaS shop sits near the giants. Running that way since 2011.
Stated mandate
FTEC Seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology Index.
XSW The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index before fees and expenses. Its mandate covers software and services companies across application software, interactive home entertainment, IT consulting and other services, and systems software.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTEC vs XSW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTEC vs XSW Cost
Overpaying XSW vs FTEC
$5,353
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTEC 0.084%
$1,773
XSW 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTEC | XSW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $634 | $480 |
| 20 | $603 | $2,454 | $1,851 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $7,126 | $5,353 |
- 0.08%FTEC, cheaper
- 0.35%XSW
- Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
- Median 0.45%
FTEC 2nd cheapest of 23 funds
XSW 5th cheapest of 23 funds
FTEC vs XSW Dividends
- FTEC 0.40%, better
- XSW 0.00%
- FTEC $1.11
- XSW None
- FTEC $0.33
- XSW
- FTEC Sep 18, 2026
- XSW
- FTEC Sep 22, 2026
- XSW
- FTEC Quarterly
- XSW
Distribution history
FTEC vs XSW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FTEC
- XSW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTEC 22.3%, betterXSW 25.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTEC 1.19, betterXSW 0.68
- Worst fall
- FTEC −35.0%, betterXSW −45.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FTEC 1.35XSW 1.37
FTEC and XSW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



