XLK ranks 1st and FTEC 2nd of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.
FTEC vs XLK
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.08%0.08%
XLK 30.3×the volume
275K8.32M
XLK +0.1pt
+24.4%+24.5%
FTEC vs XLK Performance
+138.4%+146.4%
- FTEC 0.08%
- XLK 0.08%
- FTEC $22.2B
- XLK $123B
- FTEC +25.0%
- XLK +27.1%, better
- FTEC 0.38%
- XLK 0.44%, better
- FTEC 292
- XLK 77
- FTEC 275K sh
- XLK 8.32M sh, better
- FTEC $294.64
- XLK $186.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTEC | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98 | A98 |
| Mission | A76 | |
| Risk | B55 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | A88 | A98Higher |
| Holdings | D38 | C41Higher |
| Durability | A73 | A82Higher |
Rank among Technology (Broad) funds
Same Category. FTEC and XLK are both graded against the same 23 Technology (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTECA
XLKA
In short
FTEC Fidelity's tech sleeve runs 0.08% a year and holds about 300 names, tracking an MSCI index that reaches from mega-cap chipmakers down into small-cap software. Cheap beta on the whole US tech stack, not just the giants.
XLK A 1998 original: XLK owns the technology slice of the S&P 500, about 70 names, for eight basis points. Big, heavily traded, and top-heavy by design, with quarterly caps the only brake on the giants at the top.
Stated mandate
FTEC Seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology Index.
XLK The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Technology Select Sector Index before expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTEC vs XLK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTEC vs XLK Cost
Overpaying FTEC vs XLK
$84
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTEC 0.084%
$1,773
XLK 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTEC | XLK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $147 | $7 |
| 20 | $603 | $575 | $28 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $1,689 | $84 |
- 0.08%FTEC
- 0.08%XLK
- Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
- Median 0.45%
XLK cheapest of 23 funds
FTEC 2nd cheapest of 23 funds
FTEC vs XLK Dividends
- FTEC 0.38%
- XLK 0.44%, better
- FTEC $1.11
- XLK $0.83
- FTEC $0.33
- XLK $0.22
- FTEC Sep 18, 2026
- XLK Sep 21, 2026
- FTEC Sep 22, 2026
- XLK Sep 23, 2026
- FTEC Quarterly
- XLK Quarterly
Distribution history
FTEC vs XLK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FTEC
- XLK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTEC 21.7%, betterXLK 22.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTEC 1.31, betterXLK 1.23
- Worst fall
- FTEC −35.0%XLK −33.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FTEC 1.35XLK 1.35Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





