ILCG ranks 2nd and FTGS 28th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
FTGS vs ILCG
ILCG −0.56pt a year
0.60%0.04%
FTGS 1.6×the volume
115K70.4K
ILCG +6.2pt
+17.8%+24.0%
FTGS vs ILCG Performance
+5.2%+3.2%
- FTGS 0.60%
- ILCG 0.04%, better
- FTGS $1.27B
- ILCG $3B
- FTGS +5.2%, better
- ILCG +3.2%
- FTGS 0.04%
- ILCG 0.44%, better
- FTGS 51
- ILCG 328
- FTGS 115K sh, better
- ILCG 70.4K sh
- FTGS $37.48
- ILCG $109.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTGS | ILCG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A76 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A70Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | D39 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | B68Higher | C49 |
| Durability | D38 | B64Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. FTGS and ILCG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTGSC
ILCGA
In short
FTGS Growth with a credit check. FTGS holds about 50 US names that clear screens for return on equity, long-term debt against cash, and revenue and cash flow growth. Growth that funds itself, rather than borrows for it.
ILCG Growth by Morningstar's rulebook. A 2004-vintage iShares fund that screens large and mid caps for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow and book-value growth, and charges four basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
FTGS The Fund seeks results generally corresponding to the price and yield, before fees and expenses, of The Growth StrengthTM Index. Normally, it invests at least 80% of net assets in the common stocks and REITs comprising that Index.
ILCG The fund aims to follow an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks chosen for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow, and book-value growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTGS vs ILCG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTGS vs ILCG Cost
Overpaying FTGS vs ILCG
$10,968
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTGS 0.60%
$11,817
ILCG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTGS | ILCG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $73 | $1,003 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $288 | $3,828 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $849 | $10,968 |
- 0.60%FTGS
- 0.04%ILCG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
ILCG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
FTGS 32nd cheapest of 35 funds
FTGS vs ILCG Dividends
- FTGS 0.04%
- ILCG 0.44%, better
- FTGS $0.01
- ILCG $0.48
- FTGS $0.0088
- ILCG $0.14
- FTGS Sep 24, 2026
- ILCG Sep 15, 2026
- FTGS Sep 30, 2026
- ILCG Sep 18, 2026
- FTGS Twice a year
- ILCG Quarterly
Distribution history
FTGS vs ILCG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTGS 13.8%, betterILCG 17.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTGS 0.94ILCG 1.06, better
- Worst fall
- FTGS −20.0%ILCG −35.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FTGS 1.02ILCG 1.23
FTGS and ILCG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
