INCM ranks 1st and FTHB 10th of 15 funds in the Multi-Asset Income Category.
FTHB vs INCM
INCM −0.28pt a year
0.66%0.38%
INCM 71.6×the volume
5.83K418K
FTHB vs INCM Performance
−0.7%+1.3%
- FTHB 0.66%
- INCM 0.38%, better
- FTHB $14M
- INCM $2.03B
- FTHB
- INCM +11.0%
- FTHB
- INCM 5.26%
- FTHB 22
- INCM 395
- FTHB 5.83K sh
- INCM 418K sh, better
- FTHB $24.55
- INCM $29.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTHB | INCM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57 | A93Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C54 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | D31 | B66Higher |
| Holdings | C52 | |
| Durability | D28 | A77Higher |
Rank among Multi-Asset Income funds
Same Category. FTHB and INCM are both graded against the same 15 Multi-Asset Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTHBC
INCMA
In short
FTHB Faith-based investing is mostly a stock story. FTHB brings the biblical screen to core bonds: Treasuries, investment-grade corporates and securitized debt, actively picked, with a framework built alongside Grand Canyon University.
INCM A go-anywhere income hunt in ETF form: Franklin's managers roam across asset classes chasing current income, hold roughly 400 positions, charge 0.38%, and pay out monthly.
Stated mandate
FTHB The Fund seeks current income and treats long-term capital appreciation as a secondary objective.
INCM The fund seeks a high level of current income, with long-term capital appreciation as a secondary objective.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTHB vs INCM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTHB vs INCM Cost
Overpaying FTHB vs INCM
$5,190
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTHB 0.66%
$12,896
INCM 0.38%
$7,706
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTHB | INCM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,180 | $688 | $492 |
| 20 | $4,504 | $2,658 | $1,846 |
| 30 | $12,896 | $7,706 | $5,190 |
- 0.66%FTHB
- 0.38%INCM, cheaper
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Income funds
- Median 0.71%
INCM 2nd cheapest of 15 funds
FTHB 7th cheapest of 15 funds
FTHB vs INCM Dividends
- FTHB
- INCM 5.26%
- FTHB
- INCM $1.53
- FTHB $0.12
- INCM $0.13
- FTHB Oct 30, 2026
- INCM Oct 30, 2026
- FTHB Pays Nov 3, 2026
- INCM Pays Nov 4, 2026
- FTHB Monthly
- INCM Monthly
Distribution history
FTHB vs INCM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTHB INCM 7.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTHB INCM 1.19
- Worst fall
- FTHB INCM −7.8%
- Market sensitivity
- FTHB 0.11INCM 0.70
Popular comparisons
- 0.66% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.